tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post1479902528124706271..comments2023-10-31T09:28:27.222+00:00Comments on JUSTICE FOR MADDIE AND THE TWINS: Dead children's father held on sex chargesUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger162125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-36501129490154437362010-06-14T12:07:19.585+01:002010-06-14T12:07:19.585+01:00Hi SB, glad things are back to normal and hope you...Hi SB, glad things are back to normal and hope your hair grows back OK, LOL! LOL also about your comments concerning Gerry being dragged off, I do genuinely think he would be very threatening and intimidating to police officers and would most certainly feel he is so important the government should intervene. But I am sure Mr Cameron knows the reality about this man. <br /><br />Wiz, thanks for your post, I do recall Rosiepops going on about the kidnapping of Jeremy Vargus, I think even going back to Express days. That thing was making links that the McCanns are clearly still wishing to make and making those connections that no other person had thought to make. Of course they have given up on the case of Mari Luz given her real killer was quickly apprehended. <br /><br />As you say, the MO of these two is to take boys, I can see aged 6, 14 and 15 to sexually abuse, given they are gay they are just not interested in 3 year old little girls! <br /><br />Transferring to new post on this because I think it is worthwhile to note the desperate rubbish from the McCanns/The Sun has not actually stopped! <br /><br />Clarence Mitchell points out the McCann Dicks have not been able to investigate this, well of course they have not, these two have been in the custody of the real police who would not be allowing access to those who wish to just pervert the course of justice/the thinking of the public as to who was actually responsible for the disappearance of Maddie.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-90735792667257237672010-06-13T18:48:36.068+01:002010-06-13T18:48:36.068+01:00Hi All,
A SERIAL paedophile linked to the Madelei...Hi All,<br /><br />A SERIAL paedophile linked to the Madeleine McCann case was yesterday jailed for life for murder.<br /><br />Charles O'Neill has repeatedly refused to be quizzed by detectives working for Maddie's parents Kate and Gerry.<br /><br />The alleged linkage to Madeleine McCann is yet again nonsense O’Neill and his partner were gay and the sick pair only had interest in little boys. They chose the Gran Canaries because of its large gay community and they fitted in. PdL didn’t look like the gay capital of Portugal to me. So why or why are the McCann detectives interested in O’Neill. Desperation comes to mind.Wizardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13647410173508843374noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-41312277115112802372010-06-13T17:27:48.702+01:002010-06-13T17:27:48.702+01:00Hello there!
Thank goodness things are back to no...Hello there!<br /><br />Thank goodness things are back to normal ~ I've got bald patches from pulling my hair out through frustration, as can be seen from my frantic posts!<br /><br />Viv, I think when Gerald is finally carried-off screaming by LP, demanding government intervention and image consultants (and possibly a psychiatrist to prove diminished responsibility) he will at least be entitled to maximum exposure after the past three years award winning performance! So what better place to set the scene but his place of work!Gordonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15550763665662230716noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-5193004476323041902010-06-13T03:54:04.106+01:002010-06-13T03:54:04.106+01:00Just reposting this really good post from SB and o...Just reposting this really good post from SB and others thoughts on this would be appreciated, there are certainly a lot of coincidences, and just when did Maddie actually disappear? <br /><br />Gerry seemed to feel the need to "prove" she was around that day by going home on 20 May 2007 and then returning with what I believe is most obviously a doctored *do excuse the pun^, "LAST" (how very ominous and in tune with Gerry's perverse thought processes) picture of Maddie. It does not actually take a trip home and a wait of over a fortnight to release this precious last pic does it? For someone who was bleating and wailing about the apparent inactivity of the police that was pretty extraordinary. <br /><br />I still want to know just when Leicester Police are going to turn up at the hospital and remove Gerry McCann to the cells, where he most certainly belongs. <br /><br />S.B. said...<br /><br /> Hello again......,<br /><br /> Forgive me if the subject of Charlotte Pennington has already been discussed here but as a comparative newcomer to the forum I am not au fait with past topics.<br /><br /> In the absence of much contribution this week I decided to take another look into this young woman’s inclusion in the web of intrigue. What do I find? ~ Another confusing contradictory account of the disappearance of Madeleine Mccann!<br /> First things I find interesting is her Irish origins and that she arrived in Portugal the same day as the Mccanns to commence work with Warners, working with small children. Even on the same transit bus according to one of the tapas mob. She also apparently worked for Warners a couple of times in the past so new something of the way they operate and she had previously worked in New Zealand.<br /><br /> Next ~ is her involvement merely an extension of her past acting career, taking centre stage by way of habit or is she another cast member in this ever increasing list of players? If the former it is certainly very coincidental.<br /><br /> Thinking on the lines of Madeleines disappearance being at a much earlier time than the Mccanns seemingly fictitious timeline, Ms Penningtons conflicting statements do appear to be designed to substantiate Madeleines existence during daytime, Thursday 3rd May 2007. There is no point in my reproducing all the inconsistencies in her various statements and press interviews as they can be researched easily elsewhere, however there are one or two blatant issues that I will identify.<br /><br /> l. She states that she only had personal contact with Madeleine on two occasions - 29th April and 3rd May!<br /> 2. Did she enter the Mccanns apartment or didn’t she?<br /> 3. She didn’t previously know the Mccanns yet she evaluated their personalities very quickly and was convinced of their innocence?!?<br /> 4. We are trained to comfort people in this sort of situation?!? (is this a normal occurrence in Warner establishments).<br /> 5. Following being told that a child was missing she said that the "room was empty - the twins having been already collected by one of their friends"!?!<br /> 6 Much of this was quoted from a Daily Mail interview about 3 days after papers ran a story that on 3rd May nobody could confirm having seen Madeleine for about 7 hours - Metedeo 3 having already been appointed by the Mccanns!?!<br /> How does it transpire that she always seemed to be in the wrong place at the right time? Like some night predator.<br /><br /> O.K., I accept that her testimonies are riddled with inconsistencies and she could just be living a fantasy but why would anybody do such a thing if not actively involved in the plot and/or receiving a nice little sum of money from their ever depleting slush fund?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-75246872527805911992010-06-13T03:02:01.985+01:002010-06-13T03:02:01.985+01:00SB,
I am so sorry comment moderation was on and I...SB,<br /><br />I am so sorry comment moderation was on and I had not realised until I checked my emails for this blog!<br /><br />I have now published your posts and sorry to any others who were having difficulty.<br /><br />Viv xxAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-36795558173912742162010-06-12T21:14:56.476+01:002010-06-12T21:14:56.476+01:00Just testing - again!Just testing - again!Gordonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15550763665662230716noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-70992470705708669412010-06-12T21:14:56.475+01:002010-06-12T21:14:56.475+01:00Is anybody there?Is anybody there?Gordonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15550763665662230716noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-14982239250771326122010-06-12T16:22:38.523+01:002010-06-12T16:22:38.523+01:00Thousands of hits on Google:
Kate: I thought of d...Thousands of hits on Google:<br /><br />Kate: I thought of dying to end pain<br /><br />How good of you to share that with us Kate, Gerry too, and continue to forget whose pain you should really be thinking about, your own children! <br /><br />http://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&newwindow=1&rlz=1W1GPCK_en&q=Kate+McCann+-+Thought+of+dying+to+end+the+pain+of+losing+Madeleine.&meta=&aq=&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&fp=735dacf692929386viv the divhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16886404408574736819noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-77662377597481871112010-06-10T18:05:00.440+01:002010-06-10T18:05:00.440+01:00Just testingJust testingGordonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15550763665662230716noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-31891152620486363672010-06-08T20:12:12.917+01:002010-06-08T20:12:12.917+01:00If Goncalo achieved nothing else other than stoppi...If Goncalo achieved nothing else other than stopping those two from cashing in on their own little girl, who they clearly disposed of, by whatever means, he did a good day's work.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-46392172791223377252010-06-08T20:06:53.938+01:002010-06-08T20:06:53.938+01:00I wonder if the McCanns do understand now, just wh...I wonder if the McCanns do understand now, just why, in spite of the millions of pounds they have frittered, people still do not believe in their innocence and they will never be in a position to make Maddie the Movie and become multi millionaires.<br /><br />I am sure our hearts just bleed for them.<br /><br />JUSTICE FOR MADDIE! and may the McCanns finally learn to keep their grasping hands off other peoples cash!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-38856155881187174212010-06-08T19:59:35.670+01:002010-06-08T19:59:35.670+01:00Hi Wiz
I went on Claudia's blog and asked her...Hi Wiz<br /><br />I went on Claudia's blog and asked her and she does not seem to know either, commenting that she had only seen reference to it being held in May online, but she would try and find out. <br /><br />It is difficult to comment about the listing given this is in Portugal but certainly in UK terms this is now seeming rather odd to me, given they originally applied for the injunction in about April 2009. Particularly when taken in conjunction with the silence of the McCanns on the matter. <br /><br />It is looking like they just might have done the sensible thing and realised the potential costs may far outweigh the potential gains! This is not an action that would be covered by a no win no fee agreement, so the McCanns have to ask themselves the question, do they have sufficient cash left in the Find Maddie Fund to pay for this and what will the public say about the remainder of the Fund just being spent on lawyers, not that there is much change there. <br /><br />Clearly what has been spent including on so called private investigators has always been about drumming up non existent "leads" to take the heat off themselves and of course Gerry always knew "a really good team of lawyers" was going to be terribly important to them as he initially commented. Odd really for an "innocent" couple.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-73361216078544918402010-06-08T18:06:16.495+01:002010-06-08T18:06:16.495+01:00Testing!Testing!Gordonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15550763665662230716noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-40130237820138252572010-06-08T13:19:08.042+01:002010-06-08T13:19:08.042+01:00Just testing!Just testing!Gordonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15550763665662230716noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-4032569701105841992010-06-08T08:37:29.922+01:002010-06-08T08:37:29.922+01:00Hi All,
Does anyone know when the case - McCanns ...Hi All,<br /><br />Does anyone know when the case - McCanns –vs- Amaral - is to be heard in Portugal. I thought the hearing was suppose to be in May.Wizardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13647410173508843374noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-53622137791322591122010-06-08T01:14:17.166+01:002010-06-08T01:14:17.166+01:00Hiya again Hope
Well the case against Goncalo was...Hiya again Hope<br /><br />Well the case against Goncalo was supposed to be listed in May, and that has come and gone. <br /><br />If I were Goncalo I would certainly make sure there was a witness who was going to drop that out, like Ricardo or Mr Menezes. <br /><br />If there is some hitch in their action against Goncalo going forward, who is causing the hitch, British/ Portuguese Police or the McCanns themselves for fear of what else may be dropped out. Goncalo would not be libelling them at all by mentioning the Gaspar statement, that is evidence from a proper police investigation and privileged against any form of libel action. <br /><br />I think they just got too greedy and somehow felt they could stop that from being mentioned, if I was Goncalo it would be no holds barred against those two. But there again, I would never have given them a cause of action in the first place by insisting Maddie died in the apt without any definitive evidence to back that up. <br /><br />xxAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-60770007530252774022010-06-07T19:59:10.093+01:002010-06-07T19:59:10.093+01:00Hello again......,
Forgive me if the subject of C...Hello again......,<br /><br />Forgive me if the subject of Charlotte Pennington has already been discussed here but as a comparative newcomer to the forum I am not au fait with past topics.<br /><br />In the absence of much contribution this week I decided to take another look into this young woman’s inclusion in the web of intrigue. What do I find? ~ Another confusing contradictory account of the disappearance of Madeleine Mccann!<br />First things I find interesting is her Irish origins and that she arrived in Portugal the same day as the Mccanns to commence work with Warners, working with small children. Even on the same transit bus according to one of the tapas mob. She also apparently worked for Warners a couple of times in the past so new something of the way they operate and she had previously worked in New Zealand.<br /><br />Next ~ is her involvement merely an extension of her past acting career, taking centre stage by way of habit or is she another cast member in this ever increasing list of players? If the former it is certainly very coincidental.<br /><br />Thinking on the lines of Madeleines disappearance being at a much earlier time than the Mccanns seemingly fictitious timeline, Ms Penningtons conflicting statements do appear to be designed to substantiate Madeleines existence during daytime, Thursday 3rd May 2007. There is no point in my reproducing all the inconsistencies in her various statements and press interviews as they can be researched easily elsewhere, however there are one or two blatant issues that I will identify.<br /><br />l. She states that she only had personal contact with Madeleine on two occasions - 29th April and 3rd May!<br />2. Did she enter the Mccanns apartment or didn’t she?<br />3. She didn’t previously know the Mccanns yet she evaluated their personalities very quickly and was convinced of their innocence?!?<br />4. We are trained to comfort people in this sort of situation?!? (is this a normal occurrence in Warner establishments).<br />5. Following being told that a child was missing she said that the "room was empty - the twins having been already collected by one of their friends"!?!<br />6 Much of this was quoted from a Daily Mail interview about 3 days after papers ran a story that on 3rd May nobody could confirm having seen Madeleine for about 7 hours - Metedeo 3 having already been appointed by the Mccanns!?!<br />How does it transpire that she always seemed to be in the wrong place at the right time? Like some night predator.<br /><br />O.K., I accept that her testimonies are riddled with inconsistencies and she could just be living a fantasy but why would anybody do such a thing if not actively involved in the plot and/or receiving a nice little sum of money from their ever depleting slush fund?Gordonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15550763665662230716noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-44452252394051672442010-06-07T18:16:32.266+01:002010-06-07T18:16:32.266+01:00Hi Viv
I forgot that Smug Fiona is married to Dav...Hi Viv<br /><br />I forgot that Smug Fiona is married to David Payne who has been accused of having a Peadophile type conversation with Gerry and was always intrested in bathing the childeren.... <br /><br />Never a word In Daves defence either I guess they need Clarrie all to themselves (or they could not think of what to say about it) also not many people know about it (yet)....<br /><br />Bit like the court case if they go after Amaral or anyone else they may just be able to drop it into the procedings.....<br /><br />xxxhope4truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10617271855989681623noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-64884765696714752592010-06-07T17:39:03.627+01:002010-06-07T17:39:03.627+01:00Hiya Hope and lovely to see you back, I missed you...Hiya Hope and lovely to see you back, I missed you!<br /><br />I agree there is something very smug about Fiona, even right then at the time and it is very hard to imagine how she could have been so smiling, calm and collected. She is clearly equally smug and arrogant with the Police. I would be keen to see these questionnnaire LP wanted them to fill out, but know we are not going to be allowed to see them. But it does demonstrate just how important the police feel the Paynes are to solving this case. I just do not know how she can be so smug and arrogant in all the circumstances, involved with the disappearance of a little girl. <br /><br />I also agree that leaving them alone was just a farce and something the Paynes were clearly unhappy with doing hence the mother in law and the baby monitor being taken. It is utterly bizarre for any normal parents who are even taking nan, to actually plan to go on holiday and leave the kids with nothing more than a monitor and never even check on them, apparently. The mind numbing negligence that demonstrates, if it were true as they just sat there getting drunk is hard to imagine, particularly from doctors! Just because kids are quiet it does not mean they are safe! <br /><br />I do hope it will reach the stage where they are all arrested and held at separate stations as you suggest so they cannot compare notes any further. As you say, three years is a terrible long time for nothing to have happened. <br /><br />I just do not know how the McCanns have the nerve to claim any credit for Amber Alert which would not have been appropriate in this case anyway. It is used when they have details of an abductor/his car etc. Not where a child just disappears into thin air and there is no lead for the public to report on.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-5760055833441269362010-06-07T17:11:11.800+01:002010-06-07T17:11:11.800+01:00this is driving me crazythis is driving me crazyGordonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15550763665662230716noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-58288878824262663502010-06-07T17:07:29.301+01:002010-06-07T17:07:29.301+01:00I shall try once more!I shall try once more!Gordonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15550763665662230716noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-1622872920108032622010-06-07T16:52:25.737+01:002010-06-07T16:52:25.737+01:00Just testing!Just testing!Gordonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15550763665662230716noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-16435517335637943182010-06-07T16:17:29.697+01:002010-06-07T16:17:29.697+01:00It's happened again!!!It's happened again!!!Gordonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15550763665662230716noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-17028166175135593932010-06-07T16:12:59.493+01:002010-06-07T16:12:59.493+01:00HELP!
I posted two comments last Friday and again...HELP!<br /><br />I posted two comments last Friday and again yesterday but they have not be published. I sincerely hope I have not said anything to necessitate my exclusion from the blog!?!<br /><br />Instead of appearing straight off, the message appears (roughly translated) that my post must be approved before acceptance - this is contrary to what I have experienced in the past.Gordonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15550763665662230716noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-27117652844630346332010-06-07T13:31:28.970+01:002010-06-07T13:31:28.970+01:00Hello
Smug Fiona is a nasty piece of work IMHO ho...Hello<br /><br />Smug Fiona is a nasty piece of work IMHO how she could look so smug and full of herself in PDL when Maddie was first taken is beyond me.... She along with 8 other adults (if Maddie was abducted) were all a part of saying it would be fine to bugger off to the bar and have some fun while the kids were left in danger.... (If they really were left alone I am begining to doubt they were but had to be to come up with an excuse).....<br /><br />As for Kate being disapointed with the attention the Amber Alert system recieved has she ever stopped to think no one is intrested in the projects backed by a Mother who still cant be bothered to answer a single question for her missing child..?<br /><br />Not being funny but Amber Alert can only work if you are telling the truth.... They lied from the first moment it was reported to anyone outside the group it was proved the shutters were not smashed and she could not have got out that way.....<br /><br />Maddie was carried away by a man who looked like anyone who could be in the frame and no car in sight so what exactly would they have achieved with Amber Alert....<br /><br />The damming fact they never even bothered to search for her as it was "Too Dark" or even went out the days afterwards show how concerend they were they knew there was no point....<br /><br />As Di says I dont know anyone who belives them in the past there were a few who were not sure but the court case brought out things they need to keep buried as you say Viv if you have nothing to hide there can be nothing in a Pandoras Box to come out......<br /><br />Kate saying she was there she knows what happend is a strange statement as well although I am sure she was there and does know exactly what happend...<br /><br />Lets hope the investigation is re opened and they swoop on the T9 arrest them all for perverting the course of justice and interview them all at 9 seperate police stations....<br /><br />If there is a chance Maddie is still alive she deserves that much surely???<br /><br />Why she has been left to rot for three long years is beyond me I know social services are letting lots of children down alot lately but 3 years is a long time to forget about a small child....<br /><br />xxxhope4truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10617271855989681623noreply@blogger.com