tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post5832243452803132648..comments2023-10-31T09:28:27.222+00:00Comments on JUSTICE FOR MADDIE AND THE TWINS: MCCANNS TO FOCUS ON THEIR DEFENCE -MADDIE MAY HAVE BEEN MURDEREUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger49125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-2972419418557226392010-02-04T18:21:27.649+00:002010-02-04T18:21:27.649+00:00Speaking of forensic evidence, it was a catastroph...Speaking of forensic evidence, it was a catastrophic error of the Pt Police not to seize Madeleine's clothing worn that day. If she had been abused or killed the evidence would have been there, even if she had disappeared.<br /><br />They did not have set procedures to deal with such a case and were undoubtedly getting an awful lot of pressure to treat the McCanns with kid gloves, Gerry made sure of that!<br /><br />But if the McCanns wanted to clear their names, they would have known they were immediately under suspicion by operation of normal procedures and should have just made sure the police had everything they needed to clear them, every piece of evidence and every degree of co-operation. That, we can see, the McCanns were most adamant they were not going to provide, hence their permanent lacuna in the evidence as they struggle to tell us what we are not going to believe, their innocence and good parenting skills.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-12996913008800023292010-02-04T18:15:01.698+00:002010-02-04T18:15:01.698+00:00Always enjoy this poster on MM, he/she just talks ...Always enjoy this poster on MM, he/she just talks plain common sense<br /><br />fedrules Today at 8:18<br /><br /><br />Lizzy11268 wrote:<br />Thank you for your responses. Its a lot more clear now, that part of it anyway. '<br />Personally, unlike many, I have never believed the GB conspiracy theories. I think Brown was just wanting to be seen as caring like his predecessor when he initially got involved with the McCanns. I'm sure he grew to regret his decision when the suspicions about them started to emerge.<br />I don't know why Amaral was taken off the case, but it could be that it was considered to be wise knowing that he was going to have to stand trial in the Cipriano case. I believe Amaral has misunderstood the extent of the alleged government support for the McCanns. They were, due to their influential friends and relatives, given more support than an ordinary couple might have been given in such circumstances, but I don't see this as evidence of direct government involvement in the case. I really think that if forensic evidence had been stronger, they would have been charged.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-31819528525377056402010-02-04T17:53:43.946+00:002010-02-04T17:53:43.946+00:00Hiya Hope
I agree the grab marks to Kate may indi...Hiya Hope<br /><br />I agree the grab marks to Kate may indicate that she killed Madeleine and he was restraining her explaining what was going to happen. But I do think he is far too intimidating for her to lash out at him.<br /><br />New post -Astro has published full details of the temporary injunction against Goncalo, predictably the court upholding both theirs and the childrens' human rights. Pretty stern condemnation of Goncalo setting out his knowledge of the criminal process etc. Pre judging of any legal case is always considered a really bad idea!<br /><br /><br />I know people are going to see this as a terrible blow but it was predictable. It is OK for us to comment on the internet, but it is not OK to make books and television programmes so publically declaring them guilty ahead of any criminal process against them. That would make a mockery of the right to be considered innocent until proven guilty by a criminal court and the right to a fair trial.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-43317748295530846132010-02-04T16:50:28.800+00:002010-02-04T16:50:28.800+00:00The bruises on Kates arm look like grab marks to m...The bruises on Kates arm look like grab marks to me maybe it was not Gerry hurting her but Kate lashing out and being restrained?<br /><br />For people who like to defend themselves the T9 are an odd bunch...<br /><br />they are all so proud about the fact they each neglected their children to go to a bar and their is information which describes a conversation between David and Gerry which is disturbing and sick if true yet they never try and defend it???<br /><br />If they are blogging then they are desprate I would have thought it better they actually spoke to the police who will prosecute rather than try and bully control and put down people who dont agree that they have done anything other than cover up a childs death or left a child in hell for over 1000 days while they just worried about their reputations....<br /><br />Then I guess if you wake every day wondering if one of your friends will crack must make you cranky,,hope4truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10617271855989681623noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-82722015652027726412010-02-04T16:37:25.599+00:002010-02-04T16:37:25.599+00:00and the McCanns forensic answer to all of this is,...and the McCanns forensic answer to all of this is, the abductor was not there on the Tuesday when Mrs Fenn heard her, he was there on the Wednesday, the night before, doing a dummy run?<br /><br />And Madeleine or the twins did wake in the night crying?<br /><br />And Gerry even suggests well it could have happened if we had been right there. <br /><br />NO, I do not think so Gerry, there was no fantasy abductor in your apartment, only you and your friends..Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-88725227493862908392010-02-04T16:33:44.993+00:002010-02-04T16:33:44.993+00:00and of course we also know from Mrs Fenn that in f...and of course we also know from Mrs Fenn that in fact it was Maddie who was bitterly crying for one hour and fifteen minutes, not on the Wednesday, the night before, as they suggest but on Tuesday 1 May. So what was happening to Maddie on that night that the McCanns wanted to provide an excuse for, knowing I believe that Mrs Fenn had heard and reported that to the police.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-81706522372858832912010-02-04T16:29:30.010+00:002010-02-04T16:29:30.010+00:00The PJ are asking here, do they have "any kno...The PJ are asking here, do they have "any knowledge" of what happened to Madeleine. That is much wider than suspecting they were involved in her death. <br /><br />The day before seeing this UK police officer, the McCanns had both already stressed to the PJ in their evidence about the supposed crying of Maddie/the twins the night before. So why did they feel the need to reinforce this point so strongly? Particularly given it paints such a bleak picture of a couple of doctors who just leave their children alone to cry. But this seems to be a bit different "during the night". Were the McCanns now attempting to suggest that actually they were there but did not hear the cries, having regretted the impression they gave to the PJ the day before? During the night gives the impression it was not during the evening whilst they were out, but through the night when the McCanns would have been right next door. <br /><br />So let us look at what we know to be the truth. In fact, the night before Kate slept in the childrens' bedroom. So, if that is what they decided to suggest it is not possible she could not have heard the cries "during the night". Did forensics find evidence of Kate having been in that bed and confront her with that? And why would she sleep separate and apart from Gerry? Does this not suggest conflict between the couple the night before Maddie was due to disappear, and all those bruises on Kate? Was she trying to protect her kids? <br /><br />The second observation of this police officer is also very sinister. Straight away Kate and Gerry are aware the PJs have noted the twins could not wake up and so they are suggesting the abductor might have drugged all three children, a ridiculous suggestion. But it does demonstrate their guilty knowledge and how they are trying to stage the notion of some stranger coming into the apartment to remove Madeleine. We know that was Gerry!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-46625406389933672362010-02-04T16:18:19.207+00:002010-02-04T16:18:19.207+00:00Statement by: Stephen Markley
Occupation: Police ...Statement by: Stephen Markley<br /><br />Occupation: Police Officer<br /><br />This statement (composed of 2 pages and signed by me) is true and in accordance with my understanding. <br /><br />Date: 25th April 2008<br />Signature____________________________________________________<br /><br /><br />I am police officer Markley of the Leicestershire Police currently working in the criminal unit.<br /><br />In 2007 and in relation to the Portuguese investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, I was detached to Portugal in the role of family communication officer.<br /><br />According to the Portuguese PJ Letter of Request, I was asked to respond to the following question:<br /><br />Was there anything done or said by Kate or Gerry McCann in your presence or during your various meetings that could raise any suspicion that they had any knowledge about what could have happened to Madeleine, beyond the circumstances described to the Portuguese investigators?<br /><br />My reply to the question was: No.<br /><br />However, in relation to the above, I would like to add the following: At about 20.00 on Saturday 5th May 2007, I arrived at the apartment where Kate and Gerry were staying, with other officers. During the meeting Gerald and Kate had a number of questions to which they wanted follow up and responses from the PJ.<br /><br />One of these questions was that they wanted the PJ to be aware of was Madeleine’s revelation about Wednesday night, when she said that she was left alone during the night. She told Kate and Gerry that she remembered the twins crying and that she wanted to know why neither her mother nor her father had gone to the room to see what was happening.<br /><br />They also wanted to know whether the PJ had any evidence that would suggest that the person who took Madeleine had used any substance to facilitate the abduction.<br /><br /><br />This statement was made by me and is truthful in accordance with my understanding.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-378590290421300702010-02-04T16:06:58.394+00:002010-02-04T16:06:58.394+00:00Interesting view from Then there were 4 and not be...Interesting view from Then there were 4 and not beyond the realms of credibility, I certainly think Brown thought he could seize a political opportunity from this case and seriously came a cropper! :<br /><br />Let's say Brown jumped in originally because he thought it was a chance to have his very own 'Diana Moment'. Being a control freak he very stupidly gets personally involved with the whole thing and with McCann directly. So Brown has the diplomatic service running around doing his bidding and supporting the McCanns. They send emails to Brown warning him that everything is not quite as it seemed at first and the parents could be involved. But Brown being Brown, he tears up the emails and carries on regardless. By now he has the Foreign Secretary, Miliband and Home Secretary, Smith also involved. To cut a long story short, Leicester Police were accused by Dr. Amaral of lack of cooperation with the PJ. This was at the time the McCanns were made Arguidos and did a runner. I can imagine that when the Leicester Police returned as well, that some questions were asked and they laid the blame for everything that had gone wrong at Amaral's door. I'm certain, Brown being Brown, that he got personally involved again and discussed Amaral's position with the Portuguese Premier Socrates. shortly after these events, Dr. Amaral was removed from the case. That is political involvement; IMO it simply happened because Brown was looking for a case where he could present himself as standing up for Brits' rights, and making sure that the swarthy police worked a bit harder than usual in searching for the missing child. Imagine how he would have basked in the limelight if Madeleine had been found - Brown welcomes McCanns and Madeleine to lunch at No. 10, pictured here on the steps of No. 10 etc. etc. Gerry McCann thanks Gordon Brown for his support. "Without Gordon's help, especially getting the UK police involved, who knows whether the Portuguese police alone would have been able to find her," he said, etc. etc. blahAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-17303919116939915602010-02-04T15:44:09.369+00:002010-02-04T15:44:09.369+00:00On a more serious note, there is a really good and...On a more serious note, there is a really good and intellectual discussion going on here about Goncalo writing the book and the reasons why he did it.<br /><br />People are now alluding to the fact that he mentioned the GASPAR statement but did not make any allegations against the McCanns on the basis of that statement. In fact he accused them of the most innocuous crime one could imagine on the facts, gross negligence manslaughter and then disposing of the body. <br /><br />He has brought before the court a central witness, Mr Menezes, who has testified the McCanns could have been charged with kidnapping and child trafficking, i.e. what sex offenders do. <br /><br />That, I believe, is what Dr Goncalo Amaral really wanted the public to know! And it was published on Sky News, the McCanns are finished! <br /><br />http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2010/02/anhydrous-pentahydrate-blue-pencil.html#comment-formAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-58716719515041463812010-02-04T14:59:14.569+00:002010-02-04T14:59:14.569+00:00oh lol Hope, I have just been reading the comments...oh lol Hope, I have just been reading the comments of the author of this video, Messenger3, preaching God, the Lord Jesus and otherwise spouting pure Rosiepops. And there was me and you thinking it had shut up! It is arguing non stop on Youtube!<br /><br />I think the likely identity of Rosiepops almost certainly just has to be accepted as pure nutcase having a bit of an episode:-)))Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-16289686463438479362010-02-04T13:35:23.409+00:002010-02-04T13:35:23.409+00:00see this video on Youtube, the McCanns reply to th...see this video on Youtube, the McCanns reply to the allegations against them.<br /><br />It states Goncalo Amaral has been convicted of beating a confession out of Leonora Cipriano which as we know is JUST A COMPLETE AND UTTER LIE<br /><br />He was convicted of being nowhere near her, but failing to fill paperwork in!!<br /><br />If these people think this continuing wicked lies and propaganda are going to improve their reputation they had better think again. It just makes people more angry towards them and more determined to just keep on pointing out what wicked liars they really are. If they had nothing to hide they would have no need to partake in this obscene behaviour. I now personally hope that Goncalo wins everything and after all, he did not start the case, the MONEY GRABBING MCCANNS DID and they back it up with lies like this:<br /><br />When would they ever have time to actually look for Madeleine!!<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zwa3pAPcBHIAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-6175810269855055692010-02-04T12:55:06.102+00:002010-02-04T12:55:06.102+00:00hiya Hope
Of course we cannot be certain that is ...hiya Hope<br /><br />Of course we cannot be certain that is Fiona Payne but it is clearly an arrogant person who seems to take things very personally and seeks to suggest I am "creepy and obsessive". It was the comment "you are not being fair" though that particularly alerted me. The second message is in the same educated but arrogant tone. Another possibility is Fiona's sister Louise who I see lives in New Zealand. I recall there used to be a regular poster to Rosiepops bog from NZ.<br /><br />I believe this is yet further evidence that we have all of them blogging to "defend themselves". I recall that remark from the Daily Express from Rosiepops, "we are just trying to defend ourselves". It is the direct and personal way some of these posters make the issues that really give them away for me. <br /><br />I can understand Goncalo feeling the need to act in the way that he did given all the lies that were being printed by them in the media including all of the personal comments that were directed at him in particular apart from the PJ as a whole. <br /><br />IF YOU ARE READING FIONA I hope you will not think I am being unfair when I point out that you point blank refused to attend a reconstruction in Portugal to help find little Missing Madeleine. But the minute the McCanns need you in Portugal to try and sue Goncalo Amaral you are there like a shot. That makes you the sickest person. You are also sick to go out and leave tiny children in your apartment with a baby monitor. The whole lot of you just make me sick.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-25636779117978420522010-02-04T07:31:00.569+00:002010-02-04T07:31:00.569+00:00Morning Viv
GA IMHO wrote his book to set the rec...Morning Viv<br /><br />GA IMHO wrote his book to set the record straight about his investigation and to let anyone know who wanted to read it his side of events.<br /><br />The McCann's have been allowed to make it up it up as they go along even telling the world that they have been cleared of any involvment which is a huge lie...<br /><br />Not sure why innocent people need to lie and spin but it is obvious we have to believe them....<br /><br />Not sure if that was FP you were being "told of" by but that woman has alwasy come across as smug we are the little people who must not look her in the eye whilst daring to speak to her.. Sorry Fiona (if you are reading) you are nothing more than a self confesed child neglector who wont assist in the hunt for a child in the hands of a peadophile by attending a simple reconstruction had your friends not had such a worthy spin Dr I very much think you would be in jail now for neglecting your children.... I would not want to speak to you anymore than I would want to have a conversation with any other idiot who does not put their child first.....<br /><br />As for GA you are right Viv there is no evidence that Madeleiene is dead.... Well none we know of but there are pages of the rogs that were not published and their may be very strong evidence in them that shows she is... Maybe they dont know how or who?<br /><br />The dogs did a good job in Haiti no one doubted them there it is strange really as if lost we would welcome dogs to come and find us these dogs had a 100% record and sudenly the McCann;s are experts and their findings laughed at....<br /><br />I was not laughing when the dog picked out a childs T Shirt and her Mothers Trousers it made me cry it was so tragic....<br /><br />In my sick head I had an image of Madeleine dead after falling from the sofa and Kate finding her and holding her not wanting to let her child go what Mother would?<br /><br />What do I know I still find it hard to belive they could have planned anything but with the amount being thrown at lawyers instead of searching they cant have cared much for her at all or know she is dead and they have nothing to loose...hope4truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10617271855989681623noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-14381771535482670972010-02-04T06:53:29.065+00:002010-02-04T06:53:29.065+00:00on this thread:-))
last post 101
http://joana-mo...on this thread:-))<br /><br />last post 101<br /><br />http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2010/02/mr-krugels-claims-regarding-location-of.html#comment-formAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-38782280093657175792010-02-04T06:37:15.673+00:002010-02-04T06:37:15.673+00:00you know "Bridget" almost sounds like Fi...you know "Bridget" almost sounds like Fiona Payne herself, I am being really unfair, lol! and the further anon effort at 5 in the morning does make this person seem a bit concerned. Me I am a regular nightowler! <br /><br />Hello Fiona, dont be too tired for work, lol! xxxAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-70024772859978298672010-02-04T06:33:47.660+00:002010-02-04T06:33:47.660+00:0003/02/2010 07:58
viv said... 93
Just anoth...03/02/2010 07:58 <br />viv said... 93<br /><br /> Just another thought, why would David Payne's brother be called Simon Aldridge, surely they would have the same surname unless one of them changed their name due to having something to hide. I cannot remember where the name Simon Aldridge comes from, can someone give me a link? Is there a stmt on the PJ file?<br /> 03/02/2010 08:03 <br />Anonymous said... 94<br /><br /> Viv -There is also a mention of Nicky Aldridge. I will try to give you refs. but I'm off to work soon, so will post later.<br /> 03/02/2010 09:44 <br />Anonymous said... 95<br /><br /> "A woman was seen acting suspiciously outside Kate and Gerry McCann's apartment...... The slim, Portuguese- looking woman in a plum- coloured top and white skirt with long, dark, swept back hair acted furtively when she was spotted at 8pm on May 3 in 2007 near the Mark Warner Ocean Clib complex<br /><br /> Jane Tanner is not slim. She is normal size, but she is not slim. IMO.<br /> 03/02/2010 09:53 <br />Bridget said... 96<br /><br /> @viv.<br /><br /> With respect, you are getting completely carried away here. It makes me very uncomfortable when people start speculating on those who are nothing to do with the case. It makes them look obsessive and pretty creepy.<br /><br /> Fiona Payne does not refer to the man named as her husband's brother, but as her brother in law, so he could be her sisters husband, hence the different name. Even if he isn't to suggest that ''they would have the same surname unless one of them changed it due to having something to hide''is really unfair. Siblings can use different surnames for a whole host of reasons, none of which are frankly your business.<br /><br /> Sorry, but I just don't think that wild speculation like this puts anyone in a good light<br /> 03/02/2010 10:07 <br />Anonymous said... 97<br /><br /> Viv- Simon Aldridge is referred to in the Payne's Rog. statements. Fiona says he is her brother-in-law, so he could be married to her sister, if she has one? It was friends of the Aldridges who supplied the phones.<br /> 03/02/2010 10:10 <br />Anonymous said... 98<br /><br /> Anon 88- My thought too, when I posted the info about James Murray's article. She also made a phone call on her mobile at 8.30.<br /> 03/02/2010 10:21 <br />Anonymous said... 99<br /><br /> maybe mr. aldridge adopted his wife's surname? shouldn't be too unusual in the 21st century? just a thought.<br /> 03/02/2010 20:01 <br />viv said... 100<br /><br /> Thanks for your help guys and will have a look at the Aldridges. I find it pretty creepy that on a discussion board people cannot discuss what they are thinking and ask for the assistance of others without a personal attack. I have read an awful lot on this case "Bridget" but even so never professed to have such expertise as you, where you can state quite categorically who is "nothing to do with the case". Are you CID or PJ and in either event do you think you should be on here!!<br /> 04/02/2010 03:40 <br />Anonymous said... 101<br /><br /> Just to endorse Bridget's comments on 'wild speculation' (post 96). The Diane Webster rogatory interview tells us who Simon Aldridge is, his occupation and his place of work. (A look at the website of that place of work would suggest that his name is in fact Simon Oldridge.) http://themaddiecasefiles.com/post449.html#p449<br /> 04/02/2010 05:54Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-10972701220349965042010-02-04T06:33:04.843+00:002010-02-04T06:33:04.843+00:00Check out this snotty "Bridget", on JM b...Check out this snotty "Bridget", on JM blog telling me he is NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS CASE AND IT IS NONE OF MY BUSINESS and then bless me we get anon poster just wanting to ahem reinforce what Bridget says!<br /><br />Now when I get a post like that it always makes me think it is very much part of my business! Anything to do with the Payne family and I am finding I get this reaction:-))))Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-87618791429650023292010-02-04T06:28:27.681+00:002010-02-04T06:28:27.681+00:00full copy Di Webster rog
http://themaddiecasefile...full copy Di Webster rog<br /><br />http://themaddiecasefiles.com/post449.html?hilit=simon%20aldridge#p449Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-811327428211602272010-02-04T06:26:41.422+00:002010-02-04T06:26:41.422+00:00from the rog of Diane Webster, it is not Simon Pay...from the rog of Diane Webster, it is not Simon Payne (who arranged for them to have Portuguese mobiles) as I assumed on the mobile phone thread it is Simon Aldridge husband of Fiona's sister Louise NATES ?? who is in New Zealand, I wonder if that has anything to do with Kate going to NZ? <br /><br />But if Louise is in New Zealand it seems very odd her husband has a business in Doncaster, that is one heck of a commute, lol, and it would be interesting to know who this ALAN MIDDLETON IS that the PC just suddenly asks her about whilst discussing her mobile calls?? :<br /><br />(thanks to posters on JM for helping me with this!) <br /><br /><br />DW: "You see I don’t recall people’s mobile numbers so its (laughs).”<br /><br />PC: "No. I don’t either. It ends in one, one, five that one.”<br /><br />DW: "Yeah it ends in one, one, five.”<br /><br />PC: "And they rang you at quarter past eleven in the morning on the fourth of May, so the morning after Madeleine had gone.”<br /><br />DW: "Ah so that might have been Louise, my other daughter.”<br /><br />PC: "It quite possibly was because that would match with what we have.”<br /><br />DW: "Yeah.”<br /><br />PC: "You’ve got two Doctor daughters have you?”<br /><br />DW: "Yeah, well the one in New Zealand’s a Doctor as well but she’s a PHD Doctor, she’s a scientist. Yeah that’s, err Louisa NATES, yeah my middle daughter.”<br /><br />PC: "Okay, and do you remember why she called?”<br /><br />DW: "Err because her dad, well I would have phoned Tim to tell him what had happened and he I think probably would have got in touch with Louise.”<br /><br />PC: "There actually are quite a high number of calls to and from that number that day. I’m sure they would all, all to have been to do with Madeleine’s disappearance.”<br /><br />DW: "Yes, yeah definitely.”<br /><br />PC: "And the last number then Dianne is x, xxxxx, xxxxx, xxxx, xxxx, xxxxx, one, eight, seven, one, three.”<br /><br />DW: "One, three. Who else would I have called?”<br /><br />PC: "Do you know a Dave MIDDLETON?”<br /><br />DW: "Dave MIDDLETON? (Shakes head).”<br /><br />PC: "No?”<br /><br />DW: "No.”<br /><br />PC: "Do you know anybody in Doncaster?”<br /><br />DW: "Err no, but Louise, my middle daughter, she’s married to err Simon ALDRIDGE who, his company err Doncaster, I’m sure it’s around Doncaster where his business is.”<br /><br />PC: "What’s his line of work?”<br /><br />DW: "They’re err it’s a roof tiler.”<br /><br />PC: "That’s the one yeah.”<br /><br />DW: "Yeah.”<br /><br />PC: "Yeah. Sandtoft Roof Tiles.”<br /><br />DW: "Sandtoft yeah that’s it.”<br /><br />PC: "The person that’s bought the phone or registered the phone must be called Dave MIDDLETON. Okay, so that’s your son in-law then?”<br /><br />DW: "Yeah. Well not the Dave MIDDLETON, he’s not.”<br /><br />PC: "No.”<br /><br />DW: "No. My son in-law’s…”Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-22679207316174780062010-02-04T05:28:16.729+00:002010-02-04T05:28:16.729+00:00But of course LP would have known the disclosure r...But of course LP would have known the disclosure rules in Portugal and would be making absolutely certain nothing got disclosed for us to read about an ongoing child abuse investigation. At least they advert to one and give us a file reference number, lol! <br /><br />Our own law is in conflict with Portugal in that all investigations concerning child abuse must be kept from the public due to disclosing at risk children which simply cannot happen, they must not be identified.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-72321922856781464202010-02-04T05:24:26.464+00:002010-02-04T05:24:26.464+00:00I wonder why a very similar report for Gerry McCan...I wonder why a very similar report for Gerry McCann lists his previous address but this information is not given for Kate?<br /><br />Could it be that for a period prior to buying this house they were not living together ?<br /><br />Seems odd Kate was still on maternity leave in May 08 when the twins were 3, that is stretching it a bit!!<br /><br />Seems rather obtuse to say no work has been done on the local file of the child abuse investigation it was just opened as a compliment, a reference point for Operation Task? Much higher level and of course confidential? File links have to be provided for information sharing purposes..on UK computer systems but at that stage nothing local? It does look like there was an unwillingness to disclose in print what was going on here!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-38950491191182556672010-02-04T05:14:51.839+00:002010-02-04T05:14:51.839+00:00Cartas Rogatorias Vol III
Page 27
Leicestershire ...Cartas Rogatorias Vol III<br />Page 27<br /><br />Leicestershire Police Force<br /><br />From: DC443 J.N. HUGHES<br />To: SIO, Operation Task<br />Department: Main Crime Unit<br />Date: 16th May 2008<br />Refª<br /><br />Subject: Background Information- Gerald McCANN<br /><br /><br />Dear Sirs<br /><br />In response to your letter of request, I can provide the following information regarding the above-mentioned subject<br /><br />Gerald McCann was born on June 5, 1968 in Scotland.<br /><br />He is the bearer of British passport No **********.<br /><br />He lives with his wife and children at Orchard House, 5 The Crescent, Rothley, Leicestershire, LE7 7RW.<br /><br />The house is subject to a mortgage for the amount of GBP 323.493 with the Northern Rock Bank.<br /><br />There is no report or statement of bank credit cards listed in the research carried out. However I was alerted to the fact that if an individuals maintains an open account with the same bank or a credit card for a long period of time, these details do not appear in this type of research.<br /><br />He works for the NHS as a cardiologist at Glenfield hospital.<br /><br />His previous address was 14 Queniborough Hall Drive, Queniborough, Leicestershire, LE7 3DZ.<br /><br />His phone number is ******** and he has a mobile phone Vodafone No **********.<br /><br />He is the owner of two vehicles registered in the PNC, a light blue Volkswagen Passat - R119 and a green BVV VW Touran, FM54 CXR.<br /><br />No record was found in the National Police Computer. Search reference NE91/0031.<br /><br />A search of the crime location and information system only indicates that Mr McCann was the victim of a theft of golf clubs from inside his car in the drive way to his home on 01/04/2006. Criminal Reference NQ/010145/06-9<br /><br />A search of the local section of the child abuse shows a registration number 19309 in the CATS system. A consultation with the DC Soand from the department in question confirms that this is just a file reference, but as a complement to Operation Task system for the purpose of reference, if any investigation should be necessary by the department. No work has been done on the basis of this file.<br /><br />An examination of all other police files using a search system does not reveal any information about him.<br /><br />Submitted for your information.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-61451827524815932912010-02-04T04:54:46.944+00:002010-02-04T04:54:46.944+00:00The UK's Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 a...The UK's Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 amends the Employment Rights Act 1996 to provide a framework of legal protection for individuals who disclose information so as to expose malpractice and matters of similar concern. In the vernacular, it protects whistleblowers from victimisation and dismissal.<br /><br />The Act received Royal Assent on 2 July 1998 and came into effect a year later in 1999; need for such protection became evident from enquiries into disasters and crimes such as the 1987 capsize of the Herald of Free Enterprise, the 1988 Clapham Junction rail crash, and the 1991 Bank of Credit and Commerce International scandal. In each, employees could have prevented the occurrence had they felt that they would have received any support in raising allegations.<br /><br />The scope of the Act extends to the raising of "genuine concerns about crime, civil offences (including negligence, breach of contract, breach of administrative law), miscarriage of justice, danger to health and safety or the environment and the cover up of any of these" and extends to all employees in almost all professions; some, such as the army, are excluded.<br /><br />Protection in the event of infractions by employers is available through the industrial tribunal system; remedies include unlimited financial compensation and ordering companies to re-instate employees to their role.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-44135276442435150022010-02-04T04:53:36.150+00:002010-02-04T04:53:36.150+00:00Checked loan for that amount over 25 years at 6 pe...Checked loan for that amount over 25 years at 6 per cent which was the average rate at the time and it does work out to just over £2K per month, so unlikely to be including payment towards arrears, that was just what they needed to pay every month. I think it does place in context perhaps why the McCanns did this and why Gerry started as he meant to carry on, having that £2k per month paid out of the Fund. That would certainly take the pressure off. But someone clearly blew the whistle. Now we see from the McCanns accounts the Directors have a Whistle Blowing Policy. There are a lot of "friendly" directors on there now, John McCann, Kate McCann, Gerry McCann, Smethurst, Kennedy etc. Maybe other directors found themselves confronted with a policy that says they are not permitted to blow the whistle about how the Fund is being spent! <br /><br />See briefly below, Public Interest Disclosure Act "PIDA" as to the legal provisions on whistle blowing to regulators and the press etc , not applicable to such a company... because it would appear they have no "employees" who could blow the whistle on them! Edgar is probably hired as a self employed contractor and made to sign a confidentiality agreement. It seems to me Gerry thought of everything and I am sure it was most expedient for him and kate to become directors! Oh and Jon Corner and and...no real scrutiny at all here is there!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.com