tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post7781772700807858516..comments2023-10-31T09:28:27.222+00:00Comments on JUSTICE FOR MADDIE AND THE TWINS: CLARENCE MITCHELL BLATANT LIAR - THE EVIDENCEUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-37342819322827714812008-02-22T16:44:00.000+00:002008-02-22T16:44:00.000+00:00The comments contained on this site are defamatory...The comments contained on this site are defamatory and libellous and duly noted.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-53807636269411531532008-02-13T22:52:00.000+00:002008-02-13T22:52:00.000+00:00THANKS! gd to hear from u new poster - sorry hand...THANKS! gd to hear from u new poster - sorry hand swollen!<BR/>vivxAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-52579008751947356732008-02-13T22:08:00.000+00:002008-02-13T22:08:00.000+00:00Viv, thank you for taking the trouble with the pet...Viv, thank you for taking the trouble with the petition.Truth will prevail somedayAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-88217169460644872712008-02-13T13:59:00.000+00:002008-02-13T13:59:00.000+00:00Hi 2345I was also delighted with the email from Le...Hi 2345<BR/><BR/>I was also delighted with the email from Leicestershire police and although I posted it on the long thread thought it deserved its own place on here because of its importance and to emphasise just how false Clarence Mitchell's statement was.<BR/><BR/>I am interested to learn FBI told Clarence what they thought of him also using them as well as British Police in his lies and spin.<BR/><BR/>I think the email I received back from the government made clear that Petitions cannot be used to make criminal allegations against an individual. This I can understand. It is the government's function to formulate policy in relation to law and order. It is only on conviction of certain serious criminals that that individual case may formulate a perceived need to legislate if the law is not sufficient to deal with the issues the case has thrown up. New legislation can then be brought in to address this by an Act of Parliament. If it is the common law (judge made law set down by precedent from other cases)that needs amending or an already existing Statute needs interpreting in a better way this can be amended by a definitive ruling from the Law Lords in the House of Lords. So there are clear separations of powers as to who is responsible. Sometimes Home Secretary's have come into conflict with the Judges when they have sought to interfere in a particular case e.g. Blunkett as to a sentencing decision. <BR/><BR/>The Home Secretary can refer a particular case for investigation by the police but this is not what generally happens. The usual way the police begin to investigate is on receipt of a complaint. In the McCanns case - their complaint their daughter had been snatched. It is not entirely unusual for people to make false complaints to the Police. The other way that people come to the attention of the police is of their own motion by the person's behaviour. I am sure that Clarence Mitchell's conduct has not escaped attention. I would not like to hazard a guess as to whether he will actually face charges for this but it is clearly possible. It could clearly be said he has sought to pervert the course of justice and, as above, made deliberately false allegations. Care needs to be taken here however, because even guilty people obviously have the right to defend themselves. Perhaps CM has crossed that line. Clearly a barrister or a solicitor could be in serious trouble for standing up in court and arguing a case on behalf of his client that his client has told him is false. I think their would be care in just how they choose to defend the McCanns. It may consist less of positive statements on their behalf and more of forcing the prosecution to prove their case, on the available evidence. <BR/><BR/>Hope that helps<BR/>Viv xAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-84988493374650412402008-02-13T11:28:00.000+00:002008-02-13T11:28:00.000+00:00Viv,Thanks - I read he heartwarming reponse from L...Viv,<BR/>Thanks - I read he heartwarming reponse from Leicester Police on 3 A's and it's good to see it here.<BR/><BR/>I also read that FBI had written some very sharp words to Clarrie regarding misinformation about FBI artists (toothman). Likewise, I would support a petition or referral to Scotland Yard for his blatant lies to the public regarding the beliefs and views of the Police. What are your views, and everyone else's ? 11.30 a.m.2345https://www.blogger.com/profile/04247950810805295689noreply@blogger.com