tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post8933445370354274133..comments2023-10-31T09:28:27.222+00:00Comments on JUSTICE FOR MADDIE AND THE TWINS: BRITISH PRESS DO REPORT SHOCK ING MADDIE TYPE CASESUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger85125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-42300359002251668332010-04-09T20:31:11.002+01:002010-04-09T20:31:11.002+01:00and as for "parents cannot be convicted of ki...and as for "parents cannot be convicted of kidnapping their own child"<br /><br />I would say don't be so silly, what do you think Karen Matthews got 8 years for? If you check I think you will find this was the major offence she was convicted of.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-88721425200295140852010-04-09T20:18:42.696+01:002010-04-09T20:18:42.696+01:00I am going to award a "rep point" to bot...I am going to award a "rep point" to both sides.<br /><br />Madeleine probably was abducted from the McCanns apartment around 6.30 to 8.30 on 3 May 2007 and there is no evidence that she died in the apartment, but there is a lot of evidence her parents were involved in her disappearance and she may well be dead now. <br /><br />But this is not actually a game for warring adults to play, and make huges pots of cash out of is it? It is about a real missing little girl.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-28092332769331952182010-04-09T20:09:54.192+01:002010-04-09T20:09:54.192+01:00Anonymous said... 170
I had questioned some o...Anonymous said... 170<br /><br /> I had questioned some of aacgs comments, politely, I hope,because my understanding was that this site supported Mr Amaral's position; as I do.He believed that M died in the apartment and his libel case is based on this. aacg seemed to be posting that there was no evidence of a death in the apartment, so I'm somewhat confused now. I know aacg supported Mr Amaral's right to free speech, but I didn't understand his position in some postings.<br /> 09/04/2010 11:23 <br /><br />Confused? Well I am sure that is not what Rosiepops or Joana want is it, both sides are just trying to explain the truth admittedly in the most confusing way. Pity the Judge!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-25919366926765060382010-04-09T20:03:59.890+01:002010-04-09T20:03:59.890+01:00Just a small point I suppose but bestiality, human...Just a small point I suppose but bestiality, human who has sex with animals, in terms of the allegations from the "Pro" side against Goncalo Amaral, that is getting a little strong!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-27735781264157720542010-04-09T19:59:18.174+01:002010-04-09T19:59:18.174+01:00Well in search of the erm "truth" we hav...Well in search of the erm "truth" we have Joana Morais on one side and then Rabidpops and her posters on the other, who certainly provide the better comedy spectacle as this post from Leonor Lawyer demostrates, ho hum which of these eloquent sides to believe is wanting to tell us the truth eh?<br /><br />But anyway Psychopops no hard feelings this is pure comedy!<br /><br />by Leonor lawyer Yesterday at 10:47 pm<br />To Mr Beast Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral:<br /><br /><br /> <br /><br />Just a few words about your new, false and defaming complaint against me to the Portuguese Bar, because we know that you Mr Beast Gonçalo, and your satanic followers, use to read this website.<br /><br /><br />How can you even insinuate that you’re not a beast? Don’t you have mirrors in your luxury apartment? For Jesus sake, don’t lie so much! We know that your horns can not be seen cause their are well hidden, but please don’t try to hide your bestiality! It’s too much!<br /><br /><br />So, you say that you’re not a beast? Hypocrite you are!<br /><br />Just remember,<br /><br /><br />- The horrors you’ve done and you’re still doing to Madeleine, Kate and Gerry;<br /><br /><br />- The horrors you’ve done and you’re still doing to Joana, Leonor and Leandro;<br /><br /><br />- The horrors you’ve done and you’re still doing to Diana, Ana and José;<br /><br /><br />- The horrors you’ve done and you’re still doing to all the children victims of violence, and their parents, by protecting the criminals involved on Joana and Madeleine kidnappings;<br /><br /><br />- The horrors you’ve done and you’re still doing to all the good Portuguese and British citizens by incentivizing a fascist country and a fascist police based on fake criminal investigations using torture;<br /><br /><br />Is not enough?<br /><br /><br />So, do you still maintain you’re not a beast?<br /><br /><br />Of course you are, and me and my witnesses are just going to confirm that to the Bar.<br /><br /><br />And may I inform you that the appeal of Leandro to the superior Court of Évora is already done and delivered in the Court of Faro? Yes, it’s true, so don’t sing victory yet.<br /><br /><br />And by the way, even if the fascist regime continues to protect you, don’t worry: true Justice will always be done in the end! I’m not atheist neither a Satan follower! So, True Divine Justice will always win in the end! Do you want to wait to see? Maybe it will be too late then... So, here’s my advice to you: repent of all the evil you are, ask forgiveness to all these innocent children and their parents, and divulge the names of all the criminals involved in those monstrous crimes against them, and only then I’ll stop calling what you are: a BEAST! A ferocious beast from the depths of Hell.<br /><br /><br />WE ARE WATCHING YOU.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-4962890149964006532010-04-09T03:05:17.471+01:002010-04-09T03:05:17.471+01:00Well what would you be thinking if you was the pol...Well what would you be thinking if you was the police officer, I can forgive him sounding just a bit sarcy, yeah, yeah!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-6910434507588239922010-04-09T03:00:14.213+01:002010-04-09T03:00:14.213+01:00oh whoops David Payne, grilled by Leicester Police...oh whoops David Payne, grilled by Leicester Police about a tennis bag he goes to say hide a a oh I must just change what I was going to say, love the way the police officer just goes yeah! What is anything like a tennis racquet that you would hide in a tennis bag then David! <br /><br /><br />"There was nothing of that size that you could hide a, a tennis racquet in or anything like that, it would have been just purely, if they had anything…”<br />-----------<br />David Payne<br />"Virtually. Do you know whether they took their own tennis kit out?”<br />00:03:23 Reply "Err no they didn’t.”<br />1485 "They didn’t take the kit out?”<br />Reply "No.”<br />1485 "But when I said…”<br />Reply "Oh sorry when you say the tennis kit…”<br />1485 "When I say kit.”<br />Reply "I’m talking about the, err racquet and b*lls they didn’t take.”<br />1485 "Kit in, you know, kit in general is gonna mean the attire and…”<br />Reply "Err, did they have any specific tennis gear? You know (inaudible) I don’t, I, I don’t recall that they had anything specific you know to play, you know, we all have what we ha, call tennis gear you know, not the stuff that you probably go swimming in and you know…”<br />---------------------<br /><br />"What about a kit bag? Would they have a kit bag with them?”<br />Reply "Err he certainly didn’t have a great big tennis bag or a, you know, err I mean I used to be a squash, a semi-professional squash player and you know they certainly didn’t have anything that I would call a kit bag from days when I played…”<br />1485 "Yeah.”<br />Reply "You know, a lot of sport, err if they had a rucksack with some water in that would be, you know, about as big as it got, you know a small rucksack. But it certainly wasn’t a big tennis, you know, things that you could put a tennis racquet in.”<br />1485 "Yeah.”<br />Reply "There was nothing of that size that you could hide a, a tennis racquet in or anything like that, it would have been just purely, if they had anything…”<br />1485 "Yeah.”<br />Reply "It would have been something that had their water in.”<br />1485 "So as opposed to a bag it’d be something like a rucksack, if at all?”<br />Reply "If, if at all, yeah.”<br />1485 "Yeah.”<br />Reply "Yeah.”<br />1485 "And is that the same for Kate?”<br />Reply "Yeah, yeah.”Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-84976462886809957262010-04-09T02:34:26.275+01:002010-04-09T02:34:26.275+01:00Of course interfering with proper police witnesses...Of course interfering with proper police witnesses/seeking to intimidate them/pervert the course of justice is a serious criminal offence. I am sure Brian Kennedy knew that, no problem with Mr Martin Smith and his numerous newspaper articles, the hallmark of a non police, McCanned/paid/friendly to the defence type of witness. <br /><br />I hope you get prosecuted Mr Martin Smith and fancy dragging your kids into it!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-17683969429880812232010-04-09T02:30:32.239+01:002010-04-09T02:30:32.239+01:00The McCanns contacted the Irish Smith family, whic...The McCanns contacted the Irish Smith family, which says they saw Gerry, to a certainty of 60 to 80 percent, carrying a little girl towards the beach, on the evening when Maddie disappeared. But the contact was apparently made with the purpose of drawing a photofit of the alleged abductor, according to what the Irishman told the police in his country.<br /><br />In the Maddie case process, this contact was reportedly made by Brian Kennedy, the Scottish millionaire who financially helped the McCanns in the search for their daughter. The Irish officer who questions M. Smith, in Dublin, writes in his communication to the Portuguese police that Smith refused to participate in the making of the photofit and that he did not tell the story of what he saw to the McCanns’ friend.<br /><br />The moment in which Maddie’s parents contact M. Smith is not clear. But the Irish witness only refers it to the authorities when he is heard on the 23rd of January, after seeing the images on television that livened his memory, on the 9th of September: when Gerry leaves the plane in the United Kingdom and turns his head down, M. Smith identifies the gesture as similar to what he saw in Praia da Luz four months earlier.<br /><br />What woke up Smith’s memory?<br /><br />Days after this ‘click’, the Irishman told the Leicestershire police about his suspicions; the witness also stated that it might have been the way in which Gerry transported one of the twins that made him feel that the man who he saw near the Ocean Club could have been Maddie’s father.<br /><br />Smith even clarifies that he discussed that perception with the other members of his family, who also saw the man carrying the child in Praia da Luz, but only his wife had the same feeling. Nevertheless, she did not want to give a deposition.<br /><br />M. Smith also tells that he was harassed by the media that published false declarations in his name, and that at least six newspapers apologized. The Irish policeman who led the questioning refers that he does not believe that Smith is trying to please the press, given the fact that he is, in his own opinion, an authentic person and known locally as a very decent man.<br /><br />It is remembered that the alleged abductor was seen by the entire family, and it was the conviction of the three members, who were heard by the PJ on the 26th of May 2007, that the child was Madeleine. The street where the encounter took place is approximately five metres wide.<br /><br />PJ drops lead?<br /><br />After M. Smith contacted the British authorities, the Portuguese police is informed about this new perception from the Irishman. On the 27th of September, the PJ contacts the witness and confirms the information, as well as his availability to come to Portugal, once more, to give a new statement. A trip that never happened.<br /><br />After Gonçalo Amaral left, on the 2nd of October, the PJ requests a new deposition from the witness through the Irish police. This only takes place four months later, at the end of January, and arrives into the PJ’s hands on the 19th of February.<br /><br />But the Smiths’ witness statement was dismissed by the Portuguese authorities, because it was established that at the time of the sighting, Gerry was at the Tapas restaurant. According to the process, this information was corroborated by the friends of the couple and was not contested by the employees, who are unable to identify who is who and at what time the elements from the group left and returned to the restaurant.<br /><br />It is also remembered that the Public Ministry recognizes contradictions in the depositions by the friends, and considered that the reconstitution would be a very important diligence, in order to clarify the incoherencies.<br /><br />Without indicia that the McCann couple committed any crime, the Public Ministry ordered the archiving of the process. On the 21st of July, Kate and Gerry, along with Robert Murat, saw the arguido status lifted.<br /><br /><br />source: IOL Portugal Diário, 06.08.2008Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-34220234246424876342010-04-09T02:30:19.681+01:002010-04-09T02:30:19.681+01:00Here is another report on the apparent Martin Smit...Here is another report on the apparent Martin Smith sighting, the Portuguese Police dismissed his testimony. I am not surprised. How odd for him to say well my wife thought so too but she does not want to give a statement. What when they want to help the McCanns find their missing little girl, you are so credible Martin?!<br /><br />Seems to me that once Gerry is sure he is a murder suspect Kennedy gets Smith to actually say it was Gerry he saw, oh the games they play, knowing it cannot be proved, but does cover up when she really went and what they did with her. Nasty!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-66379439739368524342010-04-09T00:39:55.688+01:002010-04-09T00:39:55.688+01:00Speaking of appalling behaviour, Clarence Mitchell...Speaking of appalling behaviour, Clarence Mitchell, March 2009, speaking of 3000 psychic tipoffs that needed to be worked through to extract any "facts". This is not a comedy sketch, Mr Mitchell..<br /><br />---<br /><br />"Sadly, the files have not revealed any substantial new leads," says Mitchell. "And sadly, they have confirmed a lot of what Kate and Gerry feared: that things haven't been done properly in certain areas, and certain things hadn't been followed up." The detective agencies they hired are no longer on the case. Have a dozen British former detectives and security service agents been employed instead, as reported? "I can't go into details, because the investigators don't wish me to. The investigation is on a smaller scale, but just as relevant."<br /><br />There is still a huge amount of material to work through: such as more than 3,000 "psychic tip-offs. Any verifiable fact in them – and some are very detailed – has to be checked".Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-57702649829811399972010-04-08T22:26:40.080+01:002010-04-08T22:26:40.080+01:00"here to find the truth of what happened to M..."here to find the truth of what happened to Madeleine like me and you"<br /><br />Words simply fail me sometimes, Joana Morais is fundraising and conducting a campaign to support Goncalo Amaral. <br /><br />Books, fundraising, paypal accounts, what is the difference to Kate and Gerry McCann, there is no difference, Madeleine has become like some pawn in a sick game. Both of these two warring sides often finish up using the same arguments to try and make themselves look right.<br /><br />There is only one thing that is right, the police and Justice for little Maddie. <br /><br />I hope that people can have a look into their consciences if they ever possessed one and stop this appalling behaviour.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-48409998518154656502010-04-08T22:08:33.534+01:002010-04-08T22:08:33.534+01:00Goncalo told us this happened by accident when the...Goncalo told us this happened by accident when they were at The Tapas, wrong!<br /><br />No amount of manipulation is going to make him right, or the McCanns!<br /><br />Two wrongs do not make a right!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-70012042962052232912010-04-08T22:01:27.912+01:002010-04-08T22:01:27.912+01:0031/03/2010 13:07
aacg said... 139
@ A 119
...31/03/2010 13:07 <br />aacg said... 139<br /><br /> @ A 119<br /> Without confrontation or at least inquiry about Mrs G.'s mental state, her testimony is just about her feeling concerning DP. We don't know whether such a conversation occurred at all. Her husband is less affirmative, is he reluctant to admit a fact that disturbs him or is he reluctant to contradict his wife ?<br /> I would never have reacted like Mrs G., I would have reacted as soon as I had heard what she says she heard. She says there was some silent embarrassment, but her reaction is just the same : null.<br /><br />----<br /><br />Both Savia and Katerina Gaspar describe the lewd conduct of David Payne and Gerry not once but twice! <br /><br />This looks to me like a poor attempt to discredit serious witnesses in this case. <br /><br />What does aacg's presumed reaction have to do with Dr Gaspar?<br /><br />And what right does aacg have to even question her mental health!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-31366436166349273742010-04-08T21:54:09.261+01:002010-04-08T21:54:09.261+01:0031/03/2010 15:27
aacg said... 148
I'm ...31/03/2010 15:27 <br />aacg said... 148<br /><br /> I'm sorry Joana, but 146 is unfounded argumentum ad hominem as well. I'm, as you know, neither a pro nor anti MC, but only interested in defending GA's right to freedom of speech, even if I don't agree with his team's conclusions (I don't agree with the MCs' doxa as well).<br /> Posters like A146 discredit your blog. They finally behave exactly as those they critic, the MC team, imposing their version of events.<br /><br /> Not only Madeleine, who loves or loved her parents, would be horrified by so much hostility, but GA too !<br /><br />=====<br /><br />At least here I can agree with this poster, I do not agree with GA either and there are certainly people who would discredit any blog with their ridiculous comments and theories. <br /><br />But I do not think a police officer who has investigated a serious and ongoing criminal case has any right to "freedom of speech" either and he would know that perfectly well.<br /><br />How would police fare all over the world if there officers retired and then started writing books about unsolved cases!!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-9360275332177602792010-04-08T21:50:01.177+01:002010-04-08T21:50:01.177+01:0031/03/2010 16:59
aacg said... 152
One nann...31/03/2010 16:59 <br />aacg said... 152<br /><br /> One nanny printed the pictures, on her own printer and with her own paper. A document proves it.<br /><br /> I do care what Martin Grime says.<br /> Interestingly he mentions that his dogs don't react to the synthetic molecule called "cadaverin".<br /> I find very interesting the article I mentioned above, which in fact shows that very few scientific researches are done on trained dogs' capacities and that the odour volatile molecules aren't yet deciphered.<br /><br />-----<br /><br />an absolutely blatant lie, there is no document whatsoever that proves any such thing, but there are lots of documents that say the police think the nanny Amy is a wicked liar! As can be seen above when this aacg is pressed to name her source, she says she cannot be bothered to look, then maybe she should not tell such lies!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-86403027221774968302010-04-08T21:47:59.249+01:002010-04-08T21:47:59.249+01:0031/03/2010 17:00
viv said... 153
aacg I do...31/03/2010 17:00 <br />viv said... 153<br /><br /> aacg I do not think Joana prevents Pro McCanns from posting on this blog, indeed I have spotted many asking me the same tired old questions in order to try and discredit. But when you speak of Madeleine's "beloved parents", given their conduct and attitudes displayed, the smirks, the shrugs, the lies, the indifference. Kate's refusal to answer police questions as Clarence freely admitted due to fear she may incriminate herself. The investigations by both British and Portuguese Police convinced they are involved in her disappearance in some way because of their obvious and contradictory lies, indeed looking at every option, abandonment, homicide, kidnapping, do you not think those words would be highly inflammatory on here, given this is obviously a blog where primarily people simply do not believe the McCanns, they believe the police? If you come into a place and make inflammatory remarks where you know the vast majority of people are going to be very upset, given their concern about little Maddie, are you not trying to cause further upset by complaining about it?<br /><br /> What on earth qualifies you to say "beloved parents" in relation to a couple who took her on holiday with them and then proceeded to dump her every hour they possibly could and then relied on their own child neglect to defend themselves?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-33877330582868720562010-04-08T21:47:13.109+01:002010-04-08T21:47:13.109+01:0031/03/2010 17:31
aacg said... 156
What on ...31/03/2010 17:31 <br />aacg said... 156<br /><br /> What on earth qualifies you to say "beloved parents"<br /><br /> Nothing qualifies me ! Just my eyes, like yours, can see that this little girl was cherished !<br /> Do please discriminate between what these people are as human beings (and who has enough wisdom to judge them ?) from a choice which was fatal in their case but finished well for their friends. Who has never done a bad choice ?<br /> The rest comes from an unbearable feeling of guilt (an incapacity to assume one's choice consequences) and is a disaster, on that point I agree totally.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-2326076980137174832010-04-08T21:46:01.982+01:002010-04-08T21:46:01.982+01:0031/03/2010 19:53
viv said... 165
accg The ...31/03/2010 19:53 <br />viv said... 165<br /><br /> accg The best I could hope for you is that you just close your eyes to what you do not want to see.<br /><br /> Have a look at Madeleine on the video with her snow white outfit on, biting her lip and looking utterly dejected. My mother was heartbroken when she looked at that. I have never seen anything so sad. Have a look at her being restrained by Kate and her grandmother from even reaching her own birthday cake. Have a look at how the last picture of Madeleine taken the day before on the tennis court just gets ignored in the McCann's campaign, in its stead they prefer an image of her in red dress with tinted red hair and an adult pose, aged about two, it is a good "marketing ploy", no doubt. But to appeal to whom, people who think adults can do children no harm, it gives him comfort says Gerry McCann?<br /><br /> Have a look at the picture of Gerry McCann playing with her the day before he got rid of her, and then trying seeing what other people see. Something that is so horrible it is hard to even contemplate, it is so cold and calculating.<br /><br /> Do not be so certain that the friends have got away with this and only the McCanns are in trouble, you may be in for one big shock!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-36834393339922105212010-04-08T21:44:17.965+01:002010-04-08T21:44:17.965+01:0031/03/2010 22:40
aacg said... 172
Viv
...31/03/2010 22:40 <br />aacg said... 172<br /><br /> Viv<br /> "Gerry McCann playing with her the day before he got rid of her"<br /> Which picture do you mean ?<br /> The picture question has always amazed me but I never found any echo.<br /> For me there's no common measure between the little girl in red with the very visible coloboma or the little girl biting her lips and the one with the tennis balls or the blue football club Tshirt. I don't recognize one in the other. Either these are different kids or quite different ages of the same one.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-69449804797402172262010-04-08T21:42:49.776+01:002010-04-08T21:42:49.776+01:0001/04/2010 13:14
aacg said... 182
@ 179
...01/04/2010 13:14 <br />aacg said... 182<br /><br /> @ 179<br /> Do you expect me going through all the files ? I'm sorry, but I have no spare time for this. I read this, I'm sure of it, but as well I found no analysis of the quality of the paper and the ink proving that the pictures were done before the 3rd of may.<br /> So if you can provide me a link to such a study, I'll find the time to look for the file document I mentioned.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-73097754294945496242010-04-08T21:41:07.107+01:002010-04-08T21:41:07.107+01:0001/04/2010 13:18
aacg said... 183
@ Anonym...01/04/2010 13:18 <br />aacg said... 183<br /><br /> @ Anonymous 181<br /> "why would they be thinking of sending her to live with relatives?"<br /> Where have you learnt they were planning such a thing ?<br /><br />=====<br /><br />PJ question to Kate McCann, that she refused to answer,<br /><br />Were you thinking of transferring custody of Madeleine to a relative.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-28379044038496168342010-04-08T21:37:09.814+01:002010-04-08T21:37:09.814+01:00Well this is just quite extraordinary! J Morais i...Well this is just quite extraordinary! J Morais is a friend of someone who can write, see below!!!<br /><br />Joana Morais said... 162<br /><br /> 140 - aacg is a friend, and not a McCann parents supporter, aacg is here to find the truth of what happened to Madeleine McCann on the 3rd of May 2007 like me and you; questions raised by aacg are sometimes pertinent even if presenting opposing views and even if based sometimes in factual mistakes regarding the PJ case files, but aacg is not alone, I've read several comments posted here which are a total adulteration of the case files - people who don't read the MM process tend to make mistakes. One more thing it is hypocritical that you say «I can't reproduce here some of the material from FAKED ABDUCTION as it would be copyright violation - but it has some interesting material regarding the creche.» when the author of that book, like another person who has been using parts of this blog to publish booklets and PDF's, has been using material translated by this blog authors and the Maddie Case Files translators team without permission. Enough said.<br /> 08/04/2010 20:53Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-26807217572621516182010-04-08T20:42:26.670+01:002010-04-08T20:42:26.670+01:00LindaGilroy
is plane spotting! ... David Camero...LindaGilroy<br /> <br />is plane spotting! ... David Cameron flying out of Plymouth? They want to stop filming of the private jets his rich friends are lending him!<br /><br />http://twitter.com/LindaGilroy<br /><br />Ah well lending jets from rich friends is the tory way, the McCann way!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8388977942755921926.post-60194625486063656342010-04-08T19:57:12.585+01:002010-04-08T19:57:12.585+01:0008/04/2010 17:39
Anonymous said... 2
Can t...08/04/2010 17:39 <br />Anonymous said... 2<br /><br /> Can the new FOI powers covering the four bodies be applied retrospectively.<br /> Will this allow us to find out why the delay in passing on information to the PJ.... amongst many other questions.<br /> Are the walls about to come down?<br /><br /> Will Viv be proved right in her undying support for these bodies<br /> or will they keep the information hidden, while they are working behind the scenes ....in their quest to get these clever people ?<br /><br /> mojo<br /><br />I was right about premeditated, I was right about Tony Bennett and I was right about cashing in.<br /><br />I am also right to point out that CEOP cannot and will not give the public details about investigations into sexual abuse of children. <br /><br />I can only say again, some people have been making utter fools of themselves and some are just plain sick and corrupt. <br /><br />JUSTICE FOR MADDIE via UK law enforcement agencies with the assistance of Portugal and other jurisdictions.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13507323081802465917noreply@blogger.com