SKY MASSIVE LIBEL PAYOUT FOR COMPARING ROBERT MURAT TO IAN HUNTLEY

Hi All, Since my return from Egypt I note there is some news that has pleased me immensely. In addition to the £600,000 libel damages from a selection of other papers, Robert has now received an undisclosed amount from Sky who were singled out and dealt with separately for what was undoubtedly just about the worst example of libel that there could be, a direct comparison to evil child murderer Ian Huntley, all in support of the sickening claim by Kate and Gerry McCann that Madeleine was supposedly abducted and here was the poor man they were seeking to blame for this, not allowing his girlfriend Michaela to escape this evil behaviour either. WE even had a piece in the articles from the Daily Express, now of course, all removed, where Kate McCann herself was claiming he had a case to answer, her low level of human behaviour or downright audacity seemingly knows no bounds. This news outlet if one could call it that the McCanns signed an exclusive deal with and none of us will forget the outrageous claims from the McCanns and their family that were peddled in cognisance of exclusive access to the gruesome twosome and their hitherto useless Pink Spinster.

For libel on this scale one could almost guarantee that Robert Murat has received at least half a million pounds from Sky taking the total amount he has now received to over one million pounds. If ever a person deserved such a massive payout it is this man and his family. No one can imagine what being the McCann's Patsy for such a long time must have truly been like, villified by their "supporters" such as "Rosiepops" as a sickening paedophile and far worse still. I also believe it is a measure of justice that the gruesome twosome, in spite of everything that was written about them received just £275,000 each, a small fraction of what Robert received. There is a simple reason for this, he is a totally innocent man who they are their friends fiercely tried to blame for Madeleine's disappearance. In stark contrast, even on their own account, although they cannot even accept it, they are responsible for the disappearance of Madeleine, who the Portuguese authorities have confirmed in no uncertain terms died in their apartment. They left their children every single night they were there, all night, every night. But somehow Gerry and Kate McCann do not accept any responsibility, no claims Gerry it was just like being in their back garden, even though those children cried pitifully for parents who did not give a damn, it was a garden where these two sad excuses for parents were oblivious to their cries and when seeking to explain Kate smirks with abandoned disdain as she describes Madeleine's complaints that they were just left to cry. So, if anyone is wondering why they only managed to con £275,000 each from just one newspaper group who ondoubtedly went over the top, whereas Robert got over a million from several media outlets, now you know the reason why, they were culpable they were to blame and they have told a lot of lies. All Robert ever did was act like a decent citizen, but their pals who flew back to have another go at Robert in July 2007 had the gall to also stand on the steps of the High Court complaining they were libelled! Gerry in yet another of his by now classical slips states they always intended to give the money to the Fund. Yes Gerry we know, you and your pals cynically ripped off the covers of Madeleine's books and plotted and schemed that very night how you would get libelled and make a mint. But you have not kidded anyone, we will continue to make sure of that.


LOVE AND BEST WISHES TO ROBERT MURAT AND HIS FAMILY AND A HOPE YOU CAN BEGIN TO FORGET THE TERRIBLE HURT AND DISRUPTION TO YOUR LIFE

LOVE TO ALL INNOCENT ABUSED CHILDREN AND MAY THEY IN THE END GET THE JUSTICE THEY TRULY DESERVE

MADELEINE YOUR PARENTS MAY HAVE FELT ABLE TO LAUGH JUST A FEW DAYS AFTER YOU HAD GONE BUT WE WILL NEVER FORGET YOU

Viv x



Madeleine McCann: Robert Murat accepts libel damages from BSkyB
Robert Murat has accepted substantial undisclosed libel damages from BSkyB over an allegation that there were strong grounds for believing that he was guilty of abducting Madeleine McCann.

By Daily Telegraph reporter Last Updated: 2:22PM GMT 14 Nov 2008

Mr Murat was made a formal suspect two weeks after Madeleine's disappearance Photo: REUTERS
Mr Murat, 34, was not at London's High Court for the settlement of his action against British Sky Broadcasting Ltd.
He had previously received a record settlement of £600,000 over "seriously defamatory" allegations in nearly 100 articles connecting him with the abduction.
He had sued Associated Newspapers, Express Newspapers, MGN Limited and News Group Newspapers.
His solicitor Louis Charalambous told Mr Justice Eady that an article and video on the Sky News website claimed that in the early days after Madeleine's disappearance from Praia da Luz, Portugal, in May 2007, Mr Murat's behaviour was reminiscent of child murderer Ian Huntley.
The article, which was published until April this year, and the video, which was accessible until this September, also suggested that Mr Murat had deliberately tried to mislead journalists by pretending to be acting in an official capacity for the police.
Victoria Shore, counsel for BSkyB, which is also paying Mr Murat's costs, made an unreserved apology for publishing the false allegations, and the distress caused.
Mr Charalambous told the judge that the allegations were entirely untrue and it was accepted that Mr Murat had no involvement whatever in the abduction of Madeleine.
"The defendant accepts that Mr Murat did not act like a child murderer nor did he try to mislead or lie to any journalists.
"It acknowledges that Mr Murat's actions after the abduction were entirely proper and were motivated by a desire to help find Madeleine McCann."
He said that Sky's apology would appear on its website for 12 months.
Ms Shore said that it very much regretted the distress caused by the publications.
Outside court, Mr Charalambous said that the settlement represented the final stage of Mr Murat's claims against those sections of the British media "which defamed him so terribly".
"He has been entirely successful and vindicated.
"He could never have brought any of these claims without the use of conditional fee agreements which gave him access to justice.
"It was particularly important to him to nail this particular lie - that he acted in some way reminiscent to the Soham murderer Ian Huntley when, in fact, he was working flat out to help try to find Madeleine."