DAILY EXPRESS REPEATEDLY REMOVING POSTS

It would seem that the DE are simply not prepared to allow any criticism of Kate and Gerry McCann which renders their forum somewhat otiose - unless of course you are a McCann sycophant! ~As will be seen they claim the post below is slanderous - written word - libellous DE!! Have they got the office junior moderating the posts? But on reading it there is a little intemperate language that could easily have been removed but nothing at all that amounts to libel. This person's comments that they should be made to pay for the neglectful way they treated their children and that a working class family would have had the children removed from their care are serious issues in the public interest that need to be properly aired. Likewise, why were the McCanns allowed to just flee Portugal rather than at the very least being placed under house arrest. These are the sort of questions the public are entitled to demand answers to - not have them promptly removed! Newspapers should be acting in the best interests of the public - it is in the best interests of the public that we are never seen to condone child neglect and very possibly much worse. Fortunately, Frogman a concerned colleague of mine emailed your post and so the unexpurgated version appears here for all to properly comment on and discuss..

When are the McPologists going to explain how leaving a distraught little girl crying on her own for two hours- and presumably waking her two even younger siblings to share in her severe distress - could be "an error of judgment" or even the "worse mistake they ever made". When are they going to explain why they went and did it again the next night...was that because all three of their little children had been silenced the twins with sedative medication and Madeleine .........God Bless her sweet soul. How much emotional harm even if she was still alive and with the gruesome twosome?


***THIS COMMENT HAS BEEN REMOVED***
02.01.08, 1:19pm

This is slanderous

• Posted by: Frogman




A BIT HARSH FROGMAN BUT VERY TRUE ;-)
02.01.08, 1:25pm

THE MURAT FILES
02.01.08, 1:19pm

Interesting to see that the apologists for the McCanns are once again picking on RM. This
guy has been the victim of a witch-hunt ever since a tabloid journalist first thought he "was a
little weird" People should not forget that, I can remember the interview with the journalsit on
SKY.

Naturally of course Mr Mitchell and his mery band of lying bastards will be trying to once
again muddy the water. As for the comments from I believe Rosiepops that 9 unbiased
witnesses claim to have seen RM and thus disprove his "alibi" is bullshit. I would be amazed if
anyone could even clearly remember if it was RM or DP that they saw. The McCanns "alibi" is
from 7 friends with whom they were having a meal but that of course is perfectly okay as far
as these McCann fans are concerned.

Lets have a reality check, the McCanns left Portugal because it was getting too hot there,
and I am not talking about the weather. At the start "We will not leave Portugal without our
daughter" to "We ae going home because we need to try and precerve normaility for the
other children" I believe and have done since the first time I saw the reports of Madeleine´s
disappearance that this young child is no longer with us and the blame is with her parents.
Whether there will ever be enough evidence to prove this beyond a reasonable doubt is
questionable but they should be made to pay for the neglectful way they treated their
children.

Does anybody believe that if this had happened in England to a working class family that they
would be allowed to reatin their other two children, no way. But of course with Branson, JK
Rowling and all those others in your corner the Social Services and going to do nothing.

It is enough to make you sick.
Justice?
If there was justice these two self centred arrogant two faced lying gits would be in custody
without bail.

• Posted by: Frogman