I wonder why Tanner and O'Brien have matching, pronounced frown lines right above their noses, unusual in young couples?
can you believe this guy would go anywhere without his watch and his mobile!!!
Nice bundleman outfit, Gerry! but you could be seen in the dark..
Hiya all, I have been listening to a couple of interviews with the McCanns available here on the BBC website:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7339940.stm
I just noted down some of the comments below from Kate and Gerry. This seems to me to be a couple who are just in complete denial of the reality of their situation. What was the point of leaving the twins also for a recent trip to Washington, how can Kate still protest Madeleine is "still out there". How on earth can she say there is "absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Madeleine has come to any harm". We are talking about a mother here, who admits, she left her and her even younger siblings on their own to cry. We are talking about a mother who is prime suspect for killing Madeleine, on the basis of forensic evidence clearly demonstrating the death of Madeleine in her and her husband's care. But we are also talking about a mother who sat there and gave this interview, not knowing that on the same day shocking details of her own witness statement would be released. Why does Kate always get so nervous when being asked to actually talk about Madeleine, would this not be the most natural thing in the world for a mom to do? Why does she always have to emphasise Madeleine was a "very loved little girl"?
How on earth can she state, with admittedly faltering and noticeably poor language skills creeping back in here "we havn't actually been accused of anything".
Is this the most perverse piece of failing to accept responsibility or comlete and utter denial we have yet seen from Kate McCann?
In relation to Gerry, he tells us that for months he has been working on this Amber Alert Project, but why, how would this get Madeleine back? As ever he is actually telling us he has been working for months on how he can try to defend them.
Again, he tells us where all the spin actually comes from, galvanising the public into responding and providing information…of false sightings and bizarre feelings about other people in PDL etc, anything to muddy the waters..We are optimistic…a further video I listened to he spoke of arguido status generally being lifted after 8 months so then they should be in the clear but as he pointed out a three months extension can be granted. Everyone can be absolutely clear the focus should be back on finding Madeleine, well now we have heard that a few times! It seems to me that Gerry in particular wants to brainwash the "ignorant public" (Kate's amazing words). Sorry Gerry but we have minds of our own. Looking at the pic above of how you just march onto the train without so much as a backward glance for your wife, we have a clear picture of you, too. I notice the concerned look at Kate, coming from Clarence Mitchell. I have often wondered just what are his feelings towards her, does he see her as a sad child killer who he is trying to protect because she appeals to his manly instincts?
Kate: Recent trip to Washington and there is still a good chance that Madeleine is still out there
We have absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Madeleine has come to any harm.
I actually think the public are ignorant!
(Pause, hand starts bouncing up and down) Madeleine was an incredibly happy, confident and very loved little girl
Difficult to come here still suspect? You know, we havn't actually been accused of anything you know and um
Gerry: Culmination of a lot of work that has gone on in the background over the months, particularly over the last four months (since the Portuguese Judge said the case must continue in January?)
We want key information to be disseminated to the public to galvanise their response and help lead to the successful recovery of the child.
We are pretty optimistic that our arguido status will be lifted soon and everyone can be absolutely clear that the focus should be on trying to find Madeleine
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7339940.stm
I just noted down some of the comments below from Kate and Gerry. This seems to me to be a couple who are just in complete denial of the reality of their situation. What was the point of leaving the twins also for a recent trip to Washington, how can Kate still protest Madeleine is "still out there". How on earth can she say there is "absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Madeleine has come to any harm". We are talking about a mother here, who admits, she left her and her even younger siblings on their own to cry. We are talking about a mother who is prime suspect for killing Madeleine, on the basis of forensic evidence clearly demonstrating the death of Madeleine in her and her husband's care. But we are also talking about a mother who sat there and gave this interview, not knowing that on the same day shocking details of her own witness statement would be released. Why does Kate always get so nervous when being asked to actually talk about Madeleine, would this not be the most natural thing in the world for a mom to do? Why does she always have to emphasise Madeleine was a "very loved little girl"?
How on earth can she state, with admittedly faltering and noticeably poor language skills creeping back in here "we havn't actually been accused of anything".
Is this the most perverse piece of failing to accept responsibility or comlete and utter denial we have yet seen from Kate McCann?
In relation to Gerry, he tells us that for months he has been working on this Amber Alert Project, but why, how would this get Madeleine back? As ever he is actually telling us he has been working for months on how he can try to defend them.
Again, he tells us where all the spin actually comes from, galvanising the public into responding and providing information…of false sightings and bizarre feelings about other people in PDL etc, anything to muddy the waters..We are optimistic…a further video I listened to he spoke of arguido status generally being lifted after 8 months so then they should be in the clear but as he pointed out a three months extension can be granted. Everyone can be absolutely clear the focus should be back on finding Madeleine, well now we have heard that a few times! It seems to me that Gerry in particular wants to brainwash the "ignorant public" (Kate's amazing words). Sorry Gerry but we have minds of our own. Looking at the pic above of how you just march onto the train without so much as a backward glance for your wife, we have a clear picture of you, too. I notice the concerned look at Kate, coming from Clarence Mitchell. I have often wondered just what are his feelings towards her, does he see her as a sad child killer who he is trying to protect because she appeals to his manly instincts?
Kate: Recent trip to Washington and there is still a good chance that Madeleine is still out there
We have absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Madeleine has come to any harm.
I actually think the public are ignorant!
(Pause, hand starts bouncing up and down) Madeleine was an incredibly happy, confident and very loved little girl
Difficult to come here still suspect? You know, we havn't actually been accused of anything you know and um
Gerry: Culmination of a lot of work that has gone on in the background over the months, particularly over the last four months (since the Portuguese Judge said the case must continue in January?)
We want key information to be disseminated to the public to galvanise their response and help lead to the successful recovery of the child.
We are pretty optimistic that our arguido status will be lifted soon and everyone can be absolutely clear that the focus should be on trying to find Madeleine
444 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 401 – 444 of 444Yes, Dolores. It is a very disturbing possibility. Very disturbing. Discretion is best now, I think. What will be will be.
BTW: it is very easy to run background checks in all sorts of ways. Questions usually lead to more questions.
Some McCann supporters on the DE spoke about the 'game'. I did warn them that this is a rough, tough old game; tougher than they could ever imagine.
Oh, well. Some people just won't be told.
Hey Swedishmum
Thanks for that. I will go and do just one episode of ER with him for a measly £20,000 but it would not be the money I was after:-)
Viv x
Thanks SM
I got lost for a while. I didn't mean yourself, Isis etc. I wanted to know if there are any moderates left on that blog ie those that use it as their primary one.
Leigh, :-)
Hiya Leigh
How you doing?
Do you think Tanner is likely to have retracted her bundleman story, and admitted she never left the table?
Maybe she had no choice?
Viv x
Viv, I have no problem at all seeing your point of view. Would you mind some competition? :-)
Hiya Doc
I got lost too, how dare they keep turning the page!
How many witnesses do you think the PJ have that would have sent Jane into a real hot flush?
Viv x
Dear Viv,
I know you would never ban me, BUT it could cause a rucass,and I don't want you to have problems with it on here.
Let me sleep on it.:)You know I love you all,and would never say anything to upset.
xx D
Hey Swedishmum I have always shared George nicely with my favourite bloggers (except Doc)
so no competion darling I will slot you in his diary:-)
Hiya, Viv.
I take it that your question is rhetorical. Jane Tanner had no choice. She is a bare faced liar; a stupid dupe; a waste of public time, and money. Fact, not 'fair comment' or any other euphemism.
She is just one reason I use the phrase 'slowly, slowly catchy monkey'. Just one reason.
Viv
5
Doc,
I wouldn't think there are. As I perceive it people posting there share views to a much higher degree than people posting here.
Dolores
Dont post anything if it might upset you, I know you are sweet natured and lovely. I am used to the flak though, so dont worry about that, I have always been a bit too outspoken for their tastes:-)
Luv you too xxxxxxxxx
Viv,
:-)
Hi Leigh,
I love that phrase of yours and I'm obviously not alone here, many are starting to use it.
Now on to the serious business of the day, future Mrs George Clooney:-
One of my old pals interviewed your errant, future husband this week. He confirms that George is, indeed, the world's most perfect man.
Clearly, my friend considers George to be a threat to mankind because he is so perfect in the eyes of womankind :-)
Something must be done to eliminate him. I suggested that you would be willing to take him off the marriage market, and make a dishonest (!) man of him.
Now, look. I've bought the wedding hat. I promoted myself to matron of honour last year. For goodness sake, will you two just tie the knot before my hat goes out of fashion.
It's the least you can do. Tsk. You lovebirds. Dilly dally while us old folks pine for the wedding...
Hiya Leigh
Could not fault your brief synopsis on the character of Tanner and agree what chance did she stand!
The thing is though it unpicks the whole scam, and that is exciting. What a can of worms!
OK Doc and thanks for such a succinct answer. Poor Janey, just a toy, like Kate.
My dear friends, I wish you all a very good night.
Have to go now because I got up at 7 am and cannot keep my eyes open anymore.
Viv, dorme bem. Beijinhos!
xxxx
Good evening Swedishmum.
Delighted to see you, as ever. Now what's a nice girl like you doing up this late at night? Honestly, I do believe we could be leading you astray :-)
Seen Big_L lately, our cheery, cuddly Scot?
Dolores,
We had a discussion on that matter (about someone being away from the table for a long time) on DE and even some of the Pros could see a possibility there. Not that K&G were involved though.
Nite Claudia, xxx
Claudia
Sleep well :)
xx D
Sonhos doces Claudia x
Boa noite, Claudia.
Rest well.
xo from Grandma Leigh, aged 102!
Leigh,
You're quite right, it's really getting too late here (I'm an hour ahead of you) and I am trying to stop this "nonsense" but it's hard. However I shall leave now (not because of your post though :-)).
Oh, I wish I had seen Big_L, but alas no.
Hey Big_L:
WHERE ARE YOU?
As i said, getting late here so
Goodnight all!
xxx
Hiya Leigh
Now its a good job your friend who interviewed my Gorgeous George was a man otherwise I might have had to check the situation out.
I think taking him off the marriage market would be a good way to get seriously down and dirty with him but George and I have both been so busy lately, as you know he is promoting his new film and he understands I am earning just as much running this blog, so does not want to stop my valuable contribution to purchase of our tropical island.
Please rest assured we have decided just as soon as Kate and Gerry do get tucked up we will be naming the date, of course you will be matron of honour darling, so please keep your fancy hat well dusted down, becase it is the final countdown to two very happy events x
Querida Claudia
Dorme bem, my lovely
ate amanha
Com amor e beijinhos
Viv
xxxxxxxxxxxxx
(luv ya luv ya luv ya)
Good night all, you lovely, brave, loyal people!
xxxx
Luv ya too, Viv! ;-)
Nite Nite
Swedishmum
I am a big L fan too and he has been on here a few times.
I will give him a big shout across cyberspace and see if I can rustle him up on here for you tomorrow, but not promises
HEY BIG L WE WANT YOU, COME ON DOWN FROM CYBERSPACE
SWEDISHMUM, VIV AND MANY OTHER FANS XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Swedishmum.
Night night. Sleep well. See you next time.
xo
leigh
Oh, future Mrs George Clooney, you do make me smile.
Goodnight from London to all our friends, wherever you are.
Remember: buy the wedding outfits. We're on a promise! There will be more than one legal ceremony taking place :-)
xo
leigh
Hey Leigh
You make me smile toox
Slowly, slowly catching those monkies.
I have give Gorgeous George a big promise for tomorrow when he gets back but it is very x rated :-)
XXXXXXX
My goodness, everyone has gone to sleep while I wasn't watching. Goodnight to all. I'm off in a mo too.
Viv,
As George lives in Lake Como, you will need to whisper sweet Italian words in his ear.
Your first lesson is
Ti amo =I love you
XX D
Night night, Viv.
One at a time...
x
leigh
zzzzzzzzzzzzz now. Tomorrow's another day :-)
Doc,
Sleep well, and start counting sheep:)
xx D
Leigh,
Sleep well, our natural born fighter of justice
.
Luv D xxx
Haha Dolores :-)
I don't count sheep, I count lemmings. Problem is I only get to 4 and then there are no more.
Regarding the Italian lessons, I think Viv would be looking more along the lines of "George, will you share your lollipop with me" ;-)
Night Dolores. Rest well.
Dolores,
Y tu, bella. Grazi.
luv, L
xo
zzzzzzzzzzzzzz definitely this time :-)
Oh please God no! Karen Matthews is rumoured to be pregnant AGAIN. That's it for tonight.
Gosh Doc ! Share his lollipop, I dont think that would cool me down!
Oh dear another baby in care! Let us hope it is just a rumour..
Dolores
ti amo!
Leigh
Not so slowly now!
Luv and nite but you all gone when I came back OOHhhh!
mark,
The hospital doctor in question helped himself to Phenegan from the pharmacy shelf. He did it on a regular basis and was accountable to no-one.
This product was not available OTC to the public - Sudafed was subject to doctor's prescription.
eurekamano,
Great, McCanns are returning on
15 - 16th May for long overdue interview on unanswered questions and questioning on ALL new evidence. Leicester Police will obviously have to be in attendance.
Presumably CM will also be going to be interviewed along with the numerous independent police witnesses.
The question remains what prevented PJ from arriving as Prosecutor ordered in early March for two month stay to get ALl statements needed for Court ?
Lengthy interviews with prime suspects have been delayed from early March to mid May - PJ envisages lengthy 8 week process, which means it will mid July before statements are collated.
PJ have yet to gain access to Gerry's computer and cuddle cat for examination. Seems it will take until late summer/autumn.
3 month extension will expire on 14th July.
Prosecutor & PJ must be angered that plans to meet prime suspects and CM in early March were in some way prevented.
As Gordon Brown does not want McCanns to be found guilty, their lawyers are undoubtedly instructed accordingly. It's not in prime suspects best interest to be spontaneously questioned in or out of Court.
Never forgetting media spin is designed to misinform and undermine standard legal procedures.
eurekamano,
In parallel cases, lawyers acting for prime suspects cannot, by law, prevent police interview processes.
They have the right to attend and advise their clients.
Prosecutor's order to PJ to requestioning and reinterview the prime suspects is not, therefore, negotiable as far as lawyers are concerned.
Standard police procedure in Portugal and Britain is non compliant suspects are made to attend for interview and arrested for the purpose if so required.
Political influences, not lawyers, continue to prevent legal procedures being implemented in Madeleine's case. PJ have been suffering intervention for seven months.
Karen Matthews and her partner have been thoroughly questioned by police. It probably entailed more than one interview to obtain the information required and obtain statements.
PJ have yet to do likewise with the prime suspects and those aiding and abetting them, including CM. Further evidence is on police files awaiting answers in preparation for Court.
Post a Comment