JUSTICE FOR MADDIE AND THE TWINS: THE FACTS DISCREPANIES IN ACCOUNTS OF MCCANNS AND JANE TANNER

2 Dec 2007

THE FACTS DISCREPANIES IN ACCOUNTS OF MCCANNS AND JANE TANNER

~What an excellant post CT 1538 I hope you dont mind me reproducing it on my blog. The links to original BBC articles are utterly damning. Thanks for those! So the children were checked at 9.30 and found to be all sleeping safe and sound and yet at 9.15 Jane Tanner now recalls she saw someone carrying off not something that could have been a child as she originally stated but Madeleine in her pink pyjamas - sounds like witchcraft! I note the McCann supporters did not want to answer you - as Rosipops would say "I dont respond to argumentative posts" LOL

ANSWERS PLEASE
02.12.07, 6:00pm
Before I ask. It's quite amusing to see the McCann defenders scrambling around looking for links to unsubstantiated newspaper reports when they're only too keen to accuse others of doing so.As I have stated before when I first took interest in this case I tried to approach it with an objective mind. I have since become suspcious of the McCanns. Here are some of the reasons, perhaps those keen to defend could explain them. I have been accused of using unsubstantiated newspaper reports before which is not true. These are based on some of the few facts we know.1) The Jane Tanner sighting. Someone said that we don't know what she originally said to the PJ but we do, because, at the McCanns' insistence they made a press release approved by team McCann.http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6695129.stmThe only thing they wanted changed was the height from 5' 10'' to 5' 7''. In the press release it states she saw a man carrying a child or an object which may have been a child. This is a significant difference to what she said on Panorama i.e. she saw a child wearing pink pyjamas with their feet uncovered. Originally the man had short hair, changed in the drawing and Panorama to down his neck. Johncar pointed out earlier that memory would fade with time not become much more accurate.2) Why did they tell relatives that the shutters had been jemmied, yet there was no evidence of this.http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/leicestershire/6623127.stm3) The continue claim that they were close by, 50 yards, is GMs usual figure.The distance was 120 metres. This can be checked on Google maps. Also the claim that they could see the apartment , even stated on Panorama by Jon Cornner looking through his camera lens,as a clear view of the apartment. Do they think people are that gullible. Very little could be seen. Probably just enough to see if a fire started although they would have probably told Madeleine about the fire exits.4) Not really fact this but can anyone explain the photo of the McCanns on Ms' birthday. The one where they are walking, alongside the crowd with balloons and flowers in their arms, like they're royalty. The grins on their faces aren't forced, but look like they're having a great time. It was her birthday !!! Good grief.5) When KM arrives at apartment at 10pm. She finds a window open. JT sees her suspect walking along the road. The inference being that the alleged abductor has climbed out of the window and over a small wall carrying a sleeping child. I find this impossible to believe. It sounds like it was written by the Grimm Brothers. I had good confirmation of this yesterday when I carried my grandson in from the car because he had fallen asleep. He has just turned 3 and if someone carried out what I have described above then we can narrow the search to an Olympic weightlifter or the like.
• Posted by: ct1538

No comments:

LAST IMAGE OF MADELEINE ACCORDING TO KATE MCCANN TAKEN ON THE MORNING OF TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007

THAT NIGHT MADDIE WAS SOBBING PITIFULLY DADDY DADDY, TWO NIGHTS LATER THEY REPORT HER MISSINGTemperature at the time only about 17-20, so how come that "sunburn"? Is it fake suntan cream hiding bruising to her arm but they could not be bothered to do her legs. Notice the pure white hand, very odd! Even more odd, why feature the red dress picture, made up and aged about two and ignore this genuine last pic? This couple even lied and said she only answers to Madeleine when know she actually answers to Maddie. Who believes they actually want her to be "found"?

My view in Brief..and the best post to this blog IMO

Viv, regarding Mrs Fenn on the night Madeleine was crying for over an hour, which stopped when she heard the parents return. As we have said before, could someone have been leaving, but could someone have been leaving with Madeleine. Perhaps Madeleine was drugged, which would account for the crying to stop suddenly, and removed.

This blog does not pursue any agenda, I do not pretend to be Pro or Anti McCann and I most certainly do not sell books or ask anyone for cash, it is just my search for the truth the way I see it and an answer to all the lies and spin we have to endure on this case - often pure and deliberate rubbish that is written by many on blogs and forums to mask the truth brainswash people to believe the unbelievable and of course, cashin.

There is an overwhelming amount of evidence the McCanns were involved in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, but there is no satisfactory evidence that confirms she died in the apartment. As the Portuguese Prosecutor has just pointed out, they could have been charged with kidnapping and trafficking Madeleine. Goncalo Amaral has behaved in an unconventional way for an ex police officer to expose Kate and Gerry McCann and there is no doubt that as parents, there is something incredibly unconventional about them!

People see what Gerry McCann wants them to see, but which cannot be proved against him, it is his mirage to feed his Fund. Maybe a few police officers, early to the case, also saw it his way. But what he, his friends and his wife really did will be their undoing.

Justice for Maddie, The Twins and all exploited and abused little children whether they are dead or alive.