THE LATEST FANTASIES FROM THE PRO-PARENTS

I have been reading the DE forum for months and can state quite categorically there has never been any mention of the twins being part of triplets or of Madeleine being chopped up. So why is this rubbish being spouted by Old Hippy I wonder and what does she hope to achieve? I am pleased to say she was neatly put in her place by Alsabella, clear, calm, lucid. Great Post again Alsabella! I would add that on a number of occasions I have personally discredited any suggestions about "swinging" as "scurrilous irrelevant gossip" but still she wants to drag it up. How sad!



OLDHIPPY
08.12.07, 11:54pm
ALSABELLA08.12.07, 11:40pmNo Alsabella your comment about Pro Truth does not apply here.The pro truth we are talking about it the rubbish that is written in the press and on here that is NOT TRUE or there is no proof that it is true.For instance it has been suggested on here that Madeleine was cut up in little pieces by her parents and smuggled into Britain, or taken from the apartment a piece at a time and put in one of the large bins. Not long after this theory was posted some of the other posters were talking about it as if it was true.We are anti that sort of things, why? because it isn't TRUE.We are also anti the posts and jokes made after it was reported in the press that the McCanns were swingers. This is another untruth and we are anti that.We want the truth from the appropriate people, not a load of junk from the press and wild imagainations of posters on this forum.That is the truth we are on about. We want the truth of what has happened to Madeleine, not some horror story about the parents cutting her up in litlle pieces being accused of being swingers and fraudsters.And what about the one that has GM not being Madeleine's real father, and that twins were actually triplets and JT has the other one.Do you call this truth?So Alsabella you are wrong on your description of what our PRO TRUTH really is.We don't care what the truth is, be it the McCanns, Murat or anyone else who is found to be guilty.• Posted by: oldhippy • Report CommentThese theories are news to me. Must have ocurred while I was out of the country, because I have certainly never read anything about Madeleine being chopped up or about triplets.I must say that in terms of the first "theory" it does not help that Joana Cipriano, who did unfortunately suffer that fate, keeps being brought up. The result is that some people consider the horrendousness of that case and think that perhaps other parents could have done something as vile. I certainly hope not. However, history is teaching us that some people are capable of the vilest of acts...I do not know what our world is coming to..As for them being swingers or not, I do not know, and frankly do not care. As I have once mentioned, this is only important if that lifestyle could have put her into contact with certain characters that needed to be investigated. Otherwise, that is there problem.To say it is true or a lie, I think is to talk without knowledge. The PJ has reported that they did not have evidence of this. However, it is equally true that this became coffee shop conversation in Luz very, very early on. smoke without fire? beats me...As far as Gerry being Madeleine's father, there are accounts that biologically she is not his child. To me this is also irrelevant, as he is the person who raised her, and as far as I am concerned, that is what makes someone a Dad. Not some sperm. It would only be important for the case in terms of determining DNA differences between her and the twins.The triplet story I had never heard of. Sounds like someone was just being silly. I would concentrate more on Jane Tanner herself and on a supposedly sick child her husband was allegedly tending to and less on non-existent triplets.There are people that exaggerate on both sides, oldhippy. People who do not even want the McCanns to be questioned, for example. Which is absolutely ridiculous. They were responsible for the child being missing anyway you look at it, so obviously they need to be questioned and they will be always considered suspects until ruled out. They have not been. And the attacks of the so-called "pro-McCann" on the police, only goes to show you that there are many on here that like Mitchell thing the McCanns are above the law. They are not. They have to go through the process as any other parent. And if there is evidence that keeps them in the loop longer than most, oh well. That is just how it is. Madeleine is the priority, not them. Precisely the same Madeleine they left alone 6 nights in a row, with her 2 baby siblings while they went off to dinner.So you will excuse me if I do not feel bad for the McCann parents. My heart goes out to little Madeleine, to her brother and sister, and to the grandparents and uncles and aunts that are trying to do the best they can in this awful situation. For the McCanns, after all the spin and crapola being through out at us by Mitchell, I feel absolutely no sorrow for them.
• Posted by: alsabelIa •