PJ is a top ten investigation police in the world WITH LAW DEGREES - I THINK THEY ARE GOOD! HOW ABOUT YOU?

is it just Kate and Gerry McCann and their merry band of men who would try to persuade us otherwise ......... WE SHALL SEE!


SOME OF YOU MAY FIND THIS INTERESTING
05.12.07, 10:33pm
- Every PJ agent was selected among thousands of candidates, their intelligence and capacity is certainly above average even before studying criminology, and only very few of the candidates reach to Inspector position. - Additionally to its individual capacities, there are the “institutional intelligence”, a background developed over many decades in the PJ with contributions of older and experimented Inspectors mixed with the modern techniques and tools. The British press and its constant attacks to PJ capacity only served to increase PJ motivation and commitment to professionally solve this crime. Remember that PJ is a top ten investigation police in the world and certainly are justifications for that. Who knows, even badly, the PJ “modus operandi”, is cautious about judging superficially some apparent facts, such as: not seal the apartment immediately or allow the Renault Scenic to be returned to the parents after the forensic tests - certainly the apartment was observed during the apparent liberation and the next Scenic itineraries tracked. Also knows that bluffing, pressing and strategic media leaks are basic resources in a complex investigation. There are even cases of suspects being liberated to allow the PJ to reach quickly to the rest of the group by monitoring the suspect movements, and in some cases with even more sophisticated methods to achieve the complete success (can’t tell you all ). The right to remain silent is not a minor or vain right. In fact, lying or accusing without proof could be damaging to any suspect as implies cumulative charges. When the PJ interrogated KM in September, I’m almost sure that her lawyer required the arguido status to use this right. When the PJ asks the correct question, and being the arguido guilty, the arguido or confesses or lyes, simple as that. If KM chooses to lye them his husband would have to lye exactly with the same answers and that would be impossible as certainly unexpected questions were posed. The unanswered questions are not denials, but as GM said “discover the body and prove it”. When JT along with 2 other T7, were confronted with RM in the PJ squad, JT pointed his finger to RM, so she made a serious accusation which could bring charges to her if any conclusive proof or independent witnesses invalidate her statement. In this way JT become more involved, in investigation terms, compared to other T7 members, so her interview in Panorama is not casual. As far as we know, RM passed satisfactorily the confrontation, and JT has on her side only her words, so is understandable the need to reiterate her statements as the great scrutiny had pointed several inconsistencies. If the PJ had cleared RM then JT would be charged, simple as that. In the end we will know exactly when bluffing, pressing and strategic media leaks occurred, not only from PJ but both sides.[/quote]
• Posted by: mamajean •